Sep 24, 2008

Poll

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/snyder/snyder15.html

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul479.html

Anonymous said...

http://tiny.pl/8s52

Hopkins economists against the bailout

Four economics professors at the Johns Hopkins University are on yesterday's petition against the bailout.

1) Its fairness. The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers’ expense. Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses. Not every business failure carries systemic risk. The government can ensure a well-functioning financial industry, able to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers, without bailing out particular investors and institutions whose choices proved unwise.

2) Its ambiguity. Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight are clear. If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards.

3) Its long-term effects. If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. For all their recent troubles, America's dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity. Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted.