I have not been paying much attention to the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Advisory Panel (which I will refer to as the Panel), because I regard it as inconsequential. Others have been paying attention, however. The minutes of the October 31, 2007 panel meeting show that Berthy de la Rosa-Aponte, the Panel Chairperson, was at pains to defend the Panel from outside criticism.
The minutes say that she referred to a letter from some Congressmen stating that the Panel had gone beyond its charge. Apparently, the letter said that the Panel had been listening too much to a "self-selected group of beneficiaries who have an interest in work, who have the capacity to participate in [the Panel's] discussions, and [that] the folks [the Panel was] hearing from aren’t really representative of the typical Social Security beneficiary."
The Chairperson also told the Panel that she had met with Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue and that he had told her that the Panel's draft final report went beyond the Panel’s charge.
Marty Ford, Chairperson for the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) spoke at the same meeting and warned that the Panel's recommendations should "not threaten necessary income supports for individuals with disabilities." She told the Panel that the CCD did not "support radical changes in the existing Social Security and SSI disability programs. " She urged the Panel to "first and foremost do no harm.'" She asked the Panel not to recommend changes in Social Security's definition of disability or that participation in work activities be made mandatory or that disability benefits be subject to time limits.
Thus far, I have been unable to find a copy of what the Panel was considering. However, in the end, it looks like the Panel listened to its critics. The final report urged only that:
The minutes say that she referred to a letter from some Congressmen stating that the Panel had gone beyond its charge. Apparently, the letter said that the Panel had been listening too much to a "self-selected group of beneficiaries who have an interest in work, who have the capacity to participate in [the Panel's] discussions, and [that] the folks [the Panel was] hearing from aren’t really representative of the typical Social Security beneficiary."
The Chairperson also told the Panel that she had met with Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue and that he had told her that the Panel's draft final report went beyond the Panel’s charge.
Marty Ford, Chairperson for the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) spoke at the same meeting and warned that the Panel's recommendations should "not threaten necessary income supports for individuals with disabilities." She told the Panel that the CCD did not "support radical changes in the existing Social Security and SSI disability programs. " She urged the Panel to "first and foremost do no harm.'" She asked the Panel not to recommend changes in Social Security's definition of disability or that participation in work activities be made mandatory or that disability benefits be subject to time limits.
Thus far, I have been unable to find a copy of what the Panel was considering. However, in the end, it looks like the Panel listened to its critics. The final report urged only that:
Congress and the Administration should take action to evaluate the impact of modernizing the Social Security definition of disability by defining disability in a manner that acknowledges the interaction between the person’s impairment and the environment and does not require the individual to prove their inability to engage in substantial gainful activity.There was no recommendation of time limited benefits or mandatory work activity or anything else radical.
No comments:
Post a Comment