Pages

Sep 30, 2008

A Snide Comment

I started not to post anything about this, but I think it is worth mentioning. Here are some excerpts from the California Appellate Report blog by Shaun Martin, professor of law at the University of San Diego (USD), about the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Crawford v. Astrue:
I'm somewhat appalled that an attorney -- especially a potentially not-very-good one -- can take a hefty amount of attorney's fees from a client in a totally simple case. The opinion here involves three cases from the law firm run by Lawrence D. Rohlfing (in Santa Fe Springs), which does social security cases and that contracts with its clients for the statutory maximum of 25% of the past-due benefits award. In the first case, an attorney affiliated with Rohlfing's firm -- Brian C. Shapiro -- spent less than 20 hours (in addition to less than five hours of paralegal time) in simple proceedings and obtained an award of $123,891.20, twenty-five percent of which would be $30,972.80. In other words, over $1500 an hour. Not bad for someone who's a 1997 graduate of Whittier Law School. Similarly, in the second case, another 1997 graduate of Whittier, Young Cho, also spent less than twenty hours (and less than five hours of paralegal time) to obtain an award the 25% contingency of which would be around $20,000.00. And in the final case, Denise Haley, an older graduate of Loyola Law School, worked 25.5 hours (plus 1.1 hours of paralegal time) to get an award the 25% contingency of which would be over $43,000; in other words, around $1700/hour. And, remember, these are not tough cases -- they're social security matters, and ones that (tellingly) take around 20 hours total to resolve. ...

Do I feel the same way about other lawsuits -- say, a difficult and hotly contested medical malpractice action? Honestly, no. There, for some reason, even if the attorney ends up making $1000+ an hour, I feel like they may well have earned it. But social security matters -- and ones that take less than a couple dozen hours at that? There's just some part of that that feels different to me.
Notice the extreme degree of condescension here even when the author knows essentially nothing about the field of law or its economics or the people involved? I wonder if Professor Martin feels like he is slumming by teaching at the USD. I guess that USD must have a much more highly highly regarded law school than Whittier or Loyola, but California readers may be able to help on that one.

I could write a good deal on the subject, but the bottom line is that attorneys are hardly eager to do federal court work in Social Security cases. Only a relatively small percentage of attorneys who represent Social Security claimants administratively even want to do the federal court work. I think a reasonable person might wonder if adequate economic incentives are in place to attract attorneys to this field of practice. Basically, if it is so easy and so lucrative, why do so few attorneys get involved? I would suggest that is is because of decisions such as Crawford.

Apparently, this is not the first time that Martin has made comments that others found offensive. Professor Martin does not allow comments on his blog, but you can e-mail him.

6 comments:

  1. I guess the truth hurts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Talk about tunnel vision! I wonder if Professor Martin has any idea how many times attorneys and non-attorney reps devote dozens of hours to cases that never get paid. He has no idea how hard we work on behalf of those we serve and how challenging it can be to devote our careers to this particular field.

    I think that most of us who work as disability reps give a lot more than legal advice to our clients, too. In my opinion, you can't put a price tag on compassion, highly specialized knowledge of an extremely complicated system, and willingness to work FOR FREE for years with no guarantee there will ever be payment on the case.

    Professor Martin sounds like one of those academics who has no idea what practice in the real world is like. Maybe he should take a sabatical and actually work in this field for a while and see how "simple" it really is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "In my opinion, you can't put a price tag on compassion..."

    I was contacted by a guy that had his Hum V blown up in Iraq and was asking about his retro benefits. Of course his attorney had already been paid and his benefits were sitting in the PC waiting to be released. The attorney was hitting up this guy for out of pocket expenses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Actually, Loyola is ranked higher than USD in US New's rankings. USD is pretty low on the list.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Graduates of Whittier and Loyola who practice law in California take tee same state bar examination other attorneys take. I took the bar exam in three states. The California bar exam was by far the toughest of the three.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is a great post it shows some information and best advice I needs for a blog. Thanks and keep on posting. Please visit http://goo.gl/l0uR2C

    ReplyDelete