Pages

Aug 26, 2010

More Signs Of The Deep Penetration Of Republican Myths About Social Security

From Firedoglake:
Matt Bai and the editors of the New York Times have printed an article ostensibly about Democratic Congressman Earl Blumenauer and his willingness to cut wasteful spending to reduce the deficit — as though eliminating unhelpful or harmful programs were an unheard of position for Democrats ...

With no apparent oversight from the Times’ editors, Bai turns the “news analysis” article into a Republican talking point attacking Social Security and the US Government’s credit worthiness ...

Here is how Matt Bai, who apparently gets his understanding of how Social Security works from Alan Simpson, describes how the Trust Fund works:

The liberal groups that are already speaking out against the debt panel’s unfinished work have chosen to start with Social Security because it is likely to be at the center of any budget compromise. “If there’s a place where it looks like Republicans and Democrats can reach agreement, we’re afraid it’s Social Security,” says Frank Clemente, the director of Strengthen Social Security. (In other words, the two parties might actually work together on something. They must be stopped!)

The coalition bases its case on the idea that Social Security is actually in fine fiscal shape, since it has amassed a pile of Treasury Bills — often referred to as i.o.u.’s — in a dedicated trust fund. This is true enough, except that the only way for the government to actually make good on these i.o.u.’s is to issue mountains of new debt or to take the money from elsewhere in the federal budget, or perhaps impose significant tax increases — none of which seem like especially practical options for the long term. So this is sort of like saying that you’re rich because your friend has promised to give you 10 million bucks just as soon as he wins the lottery.

2 comments:

  1. Ummm. Remember those Bush tax cuts for the top 1% and the budget deficits they've caused? Well, you know, you could adjust the federal income marginal tax rates for upper income people to restore progressivity to the tax system. You could do that and it would make all that BS'ing about IOU's unnecessary. If Treasury bonds are IOU's and we can just default on 'em any time we want to, what will the Saudi's and Chinese say? Don't think we can really do that. These guys oughta just go talk to their buddy Alan Simpson. Like minds, don't you know. Nancy Ortiz

    ReplyDelete
  2. Funny, isn't it Nancy, how an IOU to the Chinese is something to care about but an IOU to our senior citizens? Worthless paper. It's really that simple.

    ReplyDelete