An editorial in the Lexington, KY Herald-Leader calls for Social Security to bar Eric Conn, who has been accused of unethical conduct, from practicing before the agency. However, the paper notes that Kentucky politicians don't seem concerned about Conn.
Since Conn is (currently) an attorney admitted to the bar, SSA MUST recognize him. If he is disbarred, he will be sanctioned and will not be recognized. Or if there are cases in which there is enough proof that he violated the standards of conduct (see POMS GN03970.010 and 20 CFR 404.1740-45, then SSA can try to sanction him. This comes with a hearing and the attendant due process rights - see 20 CFR 404.1750-90). If anyone has any proofs that would help with pursuing such sanctions, I am sure SSA would love to hear about it.
ReplyDeleteLooking less and less likely that such proof exists...
ReplyDeleteSo are you saying that as long as an attorney is not disbarred SSA cannot stop that attorney from practicing in front of SSA? SSA can't sanction the attorney independently and keep the attorney from representing claimants?
ReplyDeleteanon 2:13, Actually the original poster did NOT say that. Look for the word "or" in the original post. That should provide your answer.
ReplyDeleteThe hearing is basically a kangaroo court before an ALJ of SSA's choosing. What ALJ in their right mind would choose not to sanction him, knowing the full wrath of SSA would come down on him/her?
ReplyDeleteI agree with 12:05. If the evidence were as strong as alleged why have 3 years gone by without any charges?
ReplyDeleteKnow an attorney who works for the Conn firm around the country. Very tenuous situation.
ReplyDelete