Pages

Jul 1, 2021

Union Remains At Odds With Social Security

      From Federal Computer Week:

President Joe Biden reversed much of his predecessor's workforce agenda in the first days of his administration via executive order, but unions at the Social Security Administration are unhappy with the pace of implementation of new policies. ...

The American Federation of Government Employees wants to return to the bargaining table over its 2019 contract. It was negotiated after Trump issued executive orders limiting official time, restricting union use of federal facilities and easing the process for firing poor performers, in 2018. ...

SSA finalized its review of the contract, identifying sections impacted by the rescinded orders, on June 23, said Mark Hinkle, an SSA press officer.

But AFGE officials say that the agency is conceding too little.

"It was devastating, actually, compared to what we expected. They pretty much ruled out everything," said Barri Sue Bryant, president of AFGE Local 2809, which represents employees at an SSA operations center in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., and member of the SSA General Committee.

Official time, federal time spent on union business, is a top concern for the union. In its review, the agency broke that section of the contract into pieces, ruling that some parts had "minimal" or "moderate" "potential impact" from the repealed policies, while others weren't impacted at all, Bryant said.

SSA ruled that the number of hours of official time allowed were "minimally impacted," she said, while they ruled that restrictions for what activities are allowed on union time weren't impacted.

There's a temporary agreement in place on official time that restores it to levels closer to the 2012 contract. That lasts through Oct. 31, but it's unclear what will happen next. ...

The agency ruled that teleworking policies, another key priority for the union, weren't impacted. The agency curtailed teleworking in 2019. ...

They want a better relationship with us? We've got to have a new contract. It's that simple," said Ralph DeJuliis, president of AFGE Council 220, which represents 29,000 SSA employees in field offices and telephone service centers. ...

The agency is also working on plans for bringing the workforce back to the office and instituting post-pandemic workforce policies, although some SSA employees are already in the office.

"Our agency's planning process includes ongoing communications with employees across the agency and their representatives, as well as input from other stakeholders," Hinkle said. "We will meet labor obligations associated with these plans once they are approved." ...

Union officials also say that they haven't seen a marked difference in labor-management progress, despite the change in administration.

"The only thing that's different is their tone," said DeJuliis. "Now they go through the motions, but their actions, the bargaining that we've been to … they don't really agree to anything." ...

     I don't know if the courts will find that claimants have standing to challenge Andrew Saul's tenure as Social Security Commissioner but I'm pretty sure that the union does. Saul is certainly involved in the dealings with the union. The union would be in a good position to bring some legal action, perhaps declaratory judgment, concerning whether the position of a Commissioner of Social Security who can only be removed for cause is constitutional.

4 comments:

  1. still don't understand why the government (taxpayers) pays for employees to conduct union business during work time. Unions collect dues and are a private business. They should pay/fund their own work, not the taxpayers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @ 10:16 Must be against unions in general.

    This blog has posted numerous times how the SSA staff is dwindling even though the workload and backlog is growing.

    Wonder if the union was stronger back in the day like the 1970s. Or was the SSA well funded the employees did not feel the need to complain much.

    Either way, this is just another example of big business treating employees poorly e.g. Amazon, WalMart, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.flra.gov/50th_Anniversary_EO10988

    Working men and women are not cannon fodder for the employer but should be partners in dealing with the issues that affect a worker. In a way, unions are a capitalist workers response to employers capitalism, and we now so many view capitalism as job one of the US.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @1016 because the system allows free riders. The union has to represent everyone in the bargaining unit but they can't force everyone in the bargaining unit to be a dues paying member. So the union benefits non member bargaining unit employees.

    ReplyDelete