Jul 12, 2026

Fertility Fears

      From an op ed by Lyman Stone in the New York Times:

… If America’s population does decline, it will strain our entitlements system, damage the economy, reduce innovation and entrepreneurship, and cause serious labor shortages. But the majority point of view — held by major institutions like the Census Bureau, the United Nations and the Social Security trustees — is that the United States probably won’t face population decline until the 2080s, or even beyond 2100.

That forecast is far too optimistic. The more accurate projection, which I outlined in a recent report for my organization, the Institute for Family Studies, sees the American population beginning to shrink in the 2050s. It is a forecast so grim it could upend American budgeting and, thus, American politics.

Start with the number that drives everything else. The American fertility rate has fallen below 1.6 children per woman, a record low. Replacement rate, the level that merely holds a population steady before immigration, is about 2.1. If the current trend in shrinking births continues, it’s likely that the U.S. population will largely stop growing in the 2030s, and begin to decline in the 2050s. Peak America may come before millennials meet their grandkids (if they have any. …

If birthrates continue to decline as they have been doing, then fertility will fall to 1.35 children per woman in 2050, and 1.15 by 2100. In that scenario, population growth will be anemic in the 2020s and 2030s, fall to essentially zero in the 2040s, and then, starting in the mid-2050s, experience a long, grinding decline. Each generation will be more than 30 percent smaller than the one before, the work force will shrink beneath the retirees it has to support, and the American century will give way to American contraction. …

Up until quite recently, the Social Security trustees’ main scenario assumed that fertility rates will rise from now until 2050, and stabilize at 1.9 children per woman. In 2023, the Census Bureau predicted that fertility rates will only gradually decline from 1.64 to 1.58 by 2075. Spoiler: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has already shown a 1.57 fertility rate for 2025. The U.N. expects that the U.S. fertility rate will be flat at about 1.65 through the entire 21st century. To its credit, Social Security trustees released new numbers just last month that revised their expectations down to 1.75 in 2050, but that is overly optimistic. The Congressional Budget Office is more realistic, but even it predicts that fertility will decline to 1.53, then stabilize. …

     The writer is working for a pro-natalist project but that doesn’t mean he’s wrong.  In fact, even if his projections are a bit pessimistic, he’s still talking about a serious problem. Pro-natalism is nearly hopeless, I think. We have little way as a society of influencing these highly personal decisions. Of course, pro-natalism usually has racist undertones, if not overtones, as well, but that’s a separate issue.

     We need to accept that trying to hold down immigration to almost nothing is insane. We need more legal immigrants and we need to quit worrying so much about undocumented immigrants. Social Security needs these immigrants and so does the country. Those who oppose immigration invite long term catastrophe. At least we can attract all the immigrants we need, despite the hostility that most Republicans express towards black, brown, Asian and Muslim immigrants. Make use of our country’s attractiveness to immigrants. They and their children make great citizens

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I and virtually every other conservative I know support legal immigration. You and others need to stop constantly trying to link the need to enforce our country’s immigration laws with somehow we are against all immigration. It’s simply not true. I don’t want new illegal immigrants and I want people already illegally here to be removed or we have a perpetual cycle of “oh let’s just let those already here stay.”

Illegals, while they pay sales taxes, are not contributing to social security trust funds unless their identity is somehow linked to an SSN. And even then whose SSN?

The only legal immigration I’m against are people whose beliefs (political/religious) are antithetical to the United States. And I’m sorry to say that both exist. I come from a family of legal immigrants. My family assimilated into Americana while bringing and still enjoying our religious and cultural heritage, without thrusting either on others or expecting this country to change for us.

To people who want to come to America wanting to change it, please stay where you are - unless you are willing, like I explained about my own family, that you can be a part of this country while also celebrating your own faith and culture. These two points are what built America and made it the beacon of the world despite not being perfect. The alternative will be our country’s demise.

Anonymous said...

https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2026/06/the-smartphone-hypothesis/

Anonymous said...

In this report the American Academy of Actuaries from November 2020 explains in detail how immigration from legal immigration and including undocumented workers is a major positive for the Social Security Trust Fund. http://actuary.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Immigration_Soc_Sec.pdf
Reducing immigration generally, as has happened over the past 20 years from approximately 2 Million in 2005 to about 1.25 million in 2025 has seriously damaged the prospects of the Trust Fund.
Given the declining birth rate, we need not just the numbers of immigrants but given their overall youth and energy, they are a plus for this Country, not a deficit.

Anonymous said...

If they want the birthrate in the US to increase, then they should work to address the abject greed and related issues that have made child rearing unaffordable for nearly all of childbearing age in nearly all of America’s job centers. But that won’t happen because greed seems to be the one thing the party pro-natalists identify with find more virtuous than xenophobia and racism.

Anonymous said...

You should reread that report you cited including the language after “ Other-than-LPRs are foreign workers, students with temporary
visas, and undocumented immigrants” and a couple paragraphs after that statement. After that statement the authors speak about the contributions of the non-LPR but no longer about the undocumented. They cite was I said which is that they are paid under the table and thus not contributing or using someone else’s SSN.

Anonymous said...

People without SSNs often use TINs instead, and still pay income and FICA tax. If they're using an SSN, there are a variety of possibilities, including prior legal status and it's their SSN, the SSN of someone who is deceased, or a made-up number. Very rarely are they using the numbers of living, active people, because those numbers are active and they get caught.

Anonymous said...

I bet they would find an even stronger correlation if they looked instead at tax cuts that exacerbated income inequality and the undermining of labor laws and resulting decline in wage growth versus inflation resulting from all the above. I guess it’s more fun to blame smartphones or video games though.

Anonymous said...

So why support candidates who destroy and undermine all the legal pathways to citizenship? I get that you don’t like being called racist and xenophobic, but this kind of dreck isn’t fooling anyone.

Anonymous said...

Immigrants as scourge - right wing agenda checkbox item. SSA was a mistake, because taxes are evil, gov programs should only benefit business and the rich, otherwise it's socialism, and it kills self-reliance - so forecasts of gloom and doom is right wing agenda checkbox. (Modern "plus side" is all the money to be made from the carcass of SSA's finances and people's retirements if it does go bust or get privatized, making lemonade out of lemons.) The eugenic overtones of this author are well, dog whistles to yet another GOP stalwart group. It's a soupcon of red meat to the right. Doesn't mean there are real issues here, but like a good meal, presentation matters. And this presentation is so loaded......