Jan 19, 2026

Put A Stake Through Its Heart

      From The Fulcrum:

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes. …

For advocates, the lack of formal withdrawal is both reassuring and unsettling. Reassuring because every signal from inside the agency still points to the same conclusion: the rule is dormant. Unsettling because the decision that affects hundreds of thousands of vulnerable Americans exists only in private assurances, not in public commitments. As one advocate put it, 'We were told it was dead. But nothing is dead in Washington until it’s buried.' …

     We’ll be able to tell this is officially dead when it’s removed from the Regulatory Agenda but that’s only updated quarterly and I don’t think there’s been an update since we were told this is dead.  In any case, in theory, this could come back quickly if they really wanted to bring it back but it’s really radioactive. There have never been more than a few ideologues who wanted the change. I think I know enough about this subject to say definitively that all hell would break loose if this plan were adopted.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hmm -still definitely a nonzero chance this comes back. It will be cast is some kind of antifraud thing somehow. Spending any money on social programs = fraud in their estimation.