Jan 4, 2006

Upcoming Meetings and CLE

There are always continuining legal education (CLE) sessions on Social Security and meetings of various groups of SSA and DDS employees. These are the upcoming CLEs and meetings that I am aware of:
If you know of others, please e-mail me: charles@charleshallfirm.com

Eric Schnaufer Back at Work

After suffering severe injuries in a fall and being in intensive care for a time, Eric Schnaufer is back at work, updating his schnaufer.com website with the new Social Security appellate decisions from the last month or so, including the typically elegant writing of Judge Posner in Gentle v. Barnhart from the 7th Circuit.

Interesting Comment on Age NPRM

Alan Polonsky, an attorney in private practice, made an interesting comment on Social Security's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would increase the age categories in the grid regulations by two years. Polonsky writes:
The stated premise of the proposed rule is that advances in health care have increased life expectancy. You state that the change from 1978, when the guidelines were published, to today is just under 4 years increase from 73.5 to 77. You then make the assumption that this means that at all ages, individuals are 3.5 years healthier than they were in 1978. The two do not follow.

With particular regards to the less educated, the research shows quite the opposite. On November 6, 2005, the New York Times published a synopsis of research from a paper presented by Peter Muennig at the Fall 2005 Symposium of the Campaign for Social Equity of Teacher’s College, Columbia University. The paper is available for review at http://devweb.tc.columbia.edu/manager/symposium/Files/81_Muennig_paper.ed.pdf

Among the specific findings were that the life expectancy of a high school dropout is nine years less than that of a high school graduate and that the health of a typical high school graduate is similar to that of more educated persons twenty years older.

Jan 3, 2006

Media Attention to Grid Regs Proposal

The Philadelphia Inquirer is the first traditional media outlet to have any reporting on Social Security's proposal to increase the age categories in the grid regulations by two years, a proposal that will cut disability benefits by almost $6 billion over ten years. The piece by Mark Alan Hughes criticizes the proposal on the grounds that it will have a disproportionate effect upon African Americans. Perhaps a more accurate criticism is that the proposal affects blue collar America almost exclusively and African Americans are a disproportionate part of blue collar America.

One Day Left to Comment on Age Proposal

There is only one day left to comment on Social Security's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on the age classifications in the grid regulations. The proposal would add two years onto each of the age categories, making age 57 the new 55 and 52 the new 50. The change is predicted to cut Social Security disability benefits by almost $6 billion over ten years. Anyone wanting to comment on the NPRM may do so online at an SSA website. The deadline is January 3.

Jan 2, 2006

Friedman Warns That Social Security Isn't Secure

Saul Friedman warns in Newsday that the attacks on Social Security have not ended. In 2006 he expects the President and his allies will continue their efforts to privatize Social Security.

Jan 1, 2006

Happy New Year!


Happy New Year!

Bush's Social Security Gamble

The Washington Post reviews a new book by Nancy J. Altman, entitled The Battle for Social Security: From FDR's Vision to Bush's Gamble. According to Altman, Republican attacks on Social security have a long and completely unsuccessful history. Eisenhower was one who was having nothing to do with such attacks:
He wrote to his brother Edgar in November 1954, ridiculing oil tycoon H.L. Hunt of Texas and like-minded millionaires who refused to accept Social Security. "Their number is negligible," Ike wrote his brother, "and they are stupid."