Nov 1, 2026

Not A Bit Surprised

      From the Washington Post:

Days before consequential midterm elections, the head of the Social Security Administration blasted out an email to the public praising President Donald Trump. 

“Under President Donald J. Trump, the Social Security Administration (SSA) is transforming into a model of excellence, one that meets and exceeds customer expectations for fast, accurate, and secure service,” Commissioner Frank J. Bisignano wrote to people with online Social Security accounts. 

The emails were sent on Friday and Saturday, according to copies of the email reviewed by The Washington Post and posted on social media accounts. Online, some recipients complained about the email, saying it read like propaganda. …

Oct 31, 2026

Halloween Poll

 

Oct 30, 2026

Bisignano Donates To Trump Accounts

      From an IRS press release issued on Thursday:

Today, Frank J. Bisignano, a native of Brooklyn’s Old Mill Basin neighborhood, announced a donation from The Bisignano Family Fund to the Trump Accounts of children living in his hometown zip code. A gift of $250 is being made to every child aged two to eight years old residing in zip code 11234.

“Brooklyn is home for me. My life was shaped by the people, schools, and neighborhoods in Marine Park, Mill Basin, Bergen Beach, and Flatlands,” said Bisignano. “This donation is an investment in the children of Brooklyn, giving them a boost in their personal wealth building journeys.” …

Oct 29, 2026

Peltier Wins Award

      Nextgov/FCW reports that the Public Service Leadership Academy has awarded its Government Executive of the Year award to Brian Peltier, Head of Technology, Customer Data and Artificial Intelligence at Social Security.

 …“My goal is to hide the complexity of government and make it feel simple for the person when they need us or [for] the employee serving,” Peltier said at the gala [announcing the award]. “My vision is simple: to be able to choose how you interact with us, move between channels when you need them and still get the same level of service. Maybe your aunt wants to come in her Sunday best with you all to apply for retirement. Maybe your sister was injured and needs to apply for disability from home. Neither experience is more important than the other. What matters is that we meet people where they are instead of forcing them to meet the government where [it is].” …

Oct 28, 2026

Could Removing The FICA Tax Cap Come Up For A Vote In The Next Congress?

      PolicyViz tried to find out how candidates in the 20 most hotly contested Senate races stood on proposals to solve Social Security’s funding difficulties by eliminating the cap on the FICA tax that supports Social Security. The results are enlightening. Thirteen Democrats and four independents support removing the cap while two Democrats are generally in support of raising taxes on the wealthy for this purpose but don’t endorse a specific plan. Three Republicans support eliminating the FICA cap. Only one candidate, an Republican, opposes eliminating the cap.  Sixteen Republicans and two Democrats have said nothing on the issue.

     I don’t know when this might come up in the Senate. Certainly not in the next two years if Republicans control the chamber but if Democrats are in charge, who knows? It looks like Republicans would prefer not to vote on it but if forced they may find it difficult to vote against it. Would Democrats try to bring it to a vote in the next Congress if they get a chance? They certainly wouldn’t mind forcing a tough vote on Republicans. Would Trump veto it if it comes to his desk?

Oct 27, 2026

Shorter Fully Favorable ALJ Decisions Coming

      A notice directed at those representing Social Security claimants:

Redesigned Notices for Certain Fully Favorable Disability Hearing Decisions

Date: 

Dear Colleague,

We are pleased to share that we have redesigned the decision documents you and your clients will receive for certain fully favorable disability decisions at the hearing level. The redesign aims to make these decisions more concise, easier to understand, and faster to deliver.

What Is Changing

For certain fully favorable hearing decisions, you and your clients will receive a single document titled, “Decision Notice.” This concise notice will include:

  • A statement that the decision is fully favorable.
  • The date the claimant’s disability began.
  • The reason for the finding of disability.

Your clients will also be able to access the Decision Notice through their personal mySocial Security account. The notice will explain how to request more detailed information about the decision, which will be contained in a Decisional Worksheet available in the electronic folder.

What Remains Unchanged

The Decision Notice will continue to provide information about receiving benefits, filing an appeal, and contacting us for assistance. If a fee agreement is involved, a Fee Order will be included as an enclosure. All other aspects of the process remain unchanged.

When These Changes Begin

In October, we began introducing the new Decision Notice for a limited number of fully favorable hearing decisions, and we will expand its use over time. We will continue to issue decisions using our standard Notice of Decision and Decision and Fee Order documents during this rollout as we monitor implementation.

     Anybody else old enough to remember “short form decisions”? Everything old is new again. 

A Poll

 

Oct 26, 2026

Why Does This Keep Happening?

      From Fulcrum:

Social Security's inspector general opened its books this week and found a number that should stop any controller cold: roughly $1 billion in improper Supplemental Security Income payments, made to 333,800 recipients, sitting on top of a backlog the agency has known about for years. The cause was not a hacker, not a sophisticated fraud ring, and not a policy loophole. It was an earnings alert nobody closed out.

Here is how the mechanism actually works, and why it matters more than the headline figure. When a recipient's reported earnings change, the Social Security Administration's system generates an alert flagging that the payment amount may need adjustment. An employee is supposed to resolve that alert, verify the wage documentation, and correct the payment before the gap compounds. The inspector general's office pulled a sample of 100 such cases. Only 20 had been resolved. Sixty-three had gone untouched entirely, left pending for an average of 733 days, just over two years. Seventeen more were marked "cleared" without the wage documentation ever being fully verified, meaning the case was closed on paper while the underlying question remained open.

Multiply that failure rate across the full caseload and the agency's own auditors landed on 417,291 recipients with alerts still pending, and roughly $1 billion in resulting overpayments — $344 million of it still recoverable, and $664 million gone for good under the administrative finality rules that bar the agency from clawing back money once too much time has passed. That second figure is the one a controller would flag first. It is not merely money the government failed to collect. It is money the government forfeited its own legal right to ever collect, because the paperwork sat too long. …

     Fulcrum assumes this happened because of lazy, incompetent government employees.  Of course, most people reading this blog know that’s not the case. The problem is a lack of employees to do the work. Give the agency another 15,000 employees and problems like this start to get solved in a hurry. Continue along the current track of ratcheting down the number of agency employees and this sort of problem keeps getting worse.

     Of course, the right has a solution for this. Devote whatever agency resources it takes to stamp out overpayments no matter what impact that has on those legitimately applying for and receiving SSI. If you believe that SSI shouldn’t exist in the first place, who cares whether those due benefits are paid those benefits? Those on the right only care about government benefits when it’s them or someone close to them who needs benefits. Them they’re stunned by how bad things are and often blame “them.” You know who “them” are: black and brown people, immigrants, etc. It’s a depressing part of Social Security and SSI.