The Color Of Social Security

      From the notice of a forthcoming book:

The Color of Social Security

Race, Retirement, Disability, and Disparity

Author:

Jon C. Dubin, Rutgers University, New Jersey

Published:

September 2026 

Availability:

Not yet published - available from September 2026

Format:

Hardback

ISBN:

9781009858991 …

The Color of Social Security traces the myriad ways and interconnected social systems in which racism has been embedded into American social security programs. Drawing on American history, Jon Dubin exposes institutionalized processes undermining racially equitable receipt of retirement and disability benefits. Examples include the 1935 Social Security Act, which excluded Black agricultural and domestic workers in order to protect the postbellum Southern racial economic and political order; the 1972 Supplemental Security Income program's exclusion of persons of color in the U.S. territories, with genesis in 125 years of racialized colonial domination; 1980s criminal justice system restrictions; systemic racial bias in disability decisions in the 1990s; disability eligibility obstacles from “race-norming” in the 2000s; and the misevaluation of Black claimants with sickle cell disease under Social Security Administration regulations since 2015. While exploring these histories, Dubin offers concrete solutions to address racial inequity and create a more equitable future.

• Traces racism through multiple social systems such as in employment, criminal justice and health care, and through the SSA's own adjudicative biases
• Provides historical contextualization, policy examination, and constitutional analysis, of racial inequity in both the social security retirement/old age and disability programs
• Outlines concrete policy and legal remedies, mitigations and recommendations for inequities identified in each chapter.      

     To MAGA types who feel that the only discrimination in America is against white people, I don’t care what you think. I doubt Professor Dubin does, either. Keep your hate filled opinions to yourself or to safe MAGA spaces.

Most Popular Baby Names Of 2025

     From Social Security:

Boys	Girls
1. Liam	1. Olivia
2. Noah	2. Charlotte
3. Oliver	3. Emma
4. Theodore	4. Amelia
5. Henry	5. Sophia
6. James	6. Mia
7. Elijah	7. Isabella
8. Mateo	8. Evelyn
9. William	9. Sofia
10. Lucas	10. Eliana

The New Yorker Magazine On The Sorry State Of Affairs At Social Security

      The New Yorker magazine has posted a long article on the sorry state of affairs at Social Security. Here’s one paragraph for the piece:

… Every previous Administration had launched pilot projects and fiddled with the system, but they had given managers like Jean sufficient notice and resources to train their people. Bisignano’s S.S.A. appeared to lurch from one initiative to another. Last February, it had discussed, then denied discussing, the possibility of cutting the workforce in half. It had eliminated, then partly reinstated, the option of making direct-deposit changes by phone. It had said that it would stop issuing public-policy updates, except via X, then continued to send e-mails and publish news on its website. It discouraged walk-in service, then told field offices to make the option available. It instituted a strict clawback policy for accidental overpayments, then reverted to a gradual one that gave beneficiaries a financial buffer. Changes made in response to doge’s accusations of fraud, waste, and abuse were abandoned: there was no good reason to block employees’ access to news sites, no need for redundant “I.D. proofing.” The Administration listed field offices for closure, then delisted them, though some rural outposts, in Iowa, Montana, and West Virginia, offer only phone service owing to the loss of staff. The agency is on a “slow march to implosion,” Jean said. “We’re living in a world of nobody knows anything, and nobody has any details about anything.” …

          There is this coda tacked on at the end of the piece:

 The New Yorker is committed to coverage of the federal workforce. Are you a current or former federal employee with information to share? Please use your personal device to contact us via e-mail (tammy_kim@newyorker.com) or Signal (ID: etammykim.54).

Op Ed In Baltimore Sun

      Sean Brune, Steven Evangelista, Florence Felix-Lawson, Karen Glenn, Jay Ortis and Chad Poist, who are career Social Security federal employees, have penned an op ed for the Baltimore Sun touting Frank Busignano’s term as Social Security Commissioner. The piece is quite a fluff job. I wonder who actually wrote it and how these execs came to sign on to it. It’s really quite an extraordinary politization of career employees. I don’t think any of these signatories have a future in a Democratic Administration. 

     A hundred pieces like this cannot change the circumstances on the ground. A day of reckoning approaches.

Dudek Surfaces For A Bizarre Attack On Congressman Larson

     From the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM):

Former Acting Social Security Commissioner Leland Dudek must be a skilled contortionist, because he tied himself into knots attacking a true champion of Social Security, Rep. John Larson (D-CT) in a recent Hartford Courant opinion piece — only a few months before Connecticut’s Democratic primary. (Our PAC has endorsed Congressman Larson for re-election as a longtime champion of Social Security.) 

Dudek’s column prompted a letter to the editor by NCPSSM CEO, Max Richtman:::

“I’m not sure why Leland Dudek felt compelled to inject himself into Connecticut’s District-01 Democratic primary by smearing the incumbent. I have known the congressman for nearly three decades; There is no more passionate protector of Social Security in the U.S. House than John Larson.” – NCPSSM President Max Richtman, letter to the editor of the Hartford Courant

It’s beyond audacious that Dudek, who handed the keys to the Social Security Administration to Elon Musk and DOGE in 2025, accuses Rep. Larson of undermining the program.  Dudek spent his time at SSA aligning himself with DOGE, not protecting beneficiaries. The acting commissioner essentially enabled the Trump regime to:

*Cut more than 7,000 jobs SSA, creating an understaffing crisis and massive “brain drain.”

*Copy huge troves of Americans’ personal data to be misused and abused for purposes unrelated to Social Security 

*Weaken customer service on phone lines; close and understaff SSA field offices.

*Manipulate statistics to make it appear that customer service had improved, when the opposite is true

Meanwhile, Congressman Larson, as ranking member of the House Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee, has demanded accountability and transparency. He accused Musk and DOGE of “the largest data theft in American history” – and called for participants in the stolen data scheme to be prosecuted.  …

In Dudek’s alternate universe, Rep. Larson somehow abets President Trump’s agenda. In reality, the congressman has rightly warned that Trump is attempting to “dismantle and privatize” Social Security through “chaos and confusion.”  But instead of apologizing to the people of Connecticut for his role in compromising Social Security, Dudek deflects by attacking seniors’ staunchest ally on Capitol Hill, Congressman John Larson. …

ALJ Hires

      From a job posting for Administrative Law Judges at Social Security:

The incumbent is subordinate to and accountable to the direction and supervision of the Commissioner of Social Security.  …

You must currently hold, or have previously held, a permanent Attorney position at the GS-13 or above for a minimum of 52 weeks. …

How A Phishing Expedition Works

      If you’ve wondered exactly how phishing campaigns involving Social Security Administration impersonation work, The Hacker News has you covered. If these crooks put as much effort and ingenuity into legitimate work they’d probably make more money.

Future Of AI At Social Security?

      Probably most readers of this blog have tried using AI at least to some extent. Some may be using it a lot. How much use can the Social Security Administration get out of AI? I’m generally skeptical if not hostile to the idea but I’m old. What do you think? Are you already using AI for Social Security purposes?  How well does it work for you? For that matter, to what extent is AI even available to agency employees? Is ChatGPT blocked on Social Security computers?