Aug 28, 2006

Commissioner of Social Security

According to a Social Security Press Office Fact Sheet Jo Anne Barnhart's term as Commissioner of Social Security expires on January 19, 2007. With the end of her term so near it is not surprising that rumors have already started about her future.

There was a report at one time that Barnhart hoped for another term as Commissioner. It is unclear whether she still is interested or if the President is interested. Barnhart's support for the President's Social Security "reform" proposal was half-hearted at best.

It is unclear whether Barnhart, or anyone else appointed by President Bush, could be confirmed as Commissioner. The Commissioner has a six year term. This takes the next Commissioner through the entire term of the next president. Democrats may wish to prevent anyone appointed by Bush from being confirmed so that the next president can appoint his or her own man or woman to the job. There is an easy pretext for blocking confirmation. It seems obvious that Bush will appoint someone who supports his ideas for Social Security "reform", which Democrats call privatization. Even Barnhart publically supported Bush's plan to some extent. Although the Commissioner of Social Security has little role in this debate -- and, indeed, the debate is over for all practical purposes -- Democrats can easily seize upon this as grounds for refusing to confirm someone appointed by Bush.

Regardless of whom the President nominates for Commissioner of Social Security, there will be an Acting Commissioner after January 19, 2007 for a period of at least a few months in 2007, since it will take that long for the Senate to act upon a nomination. That person could end up being Acting Commissioner for two years or more if no one appointed by President Bush can be confirmed as Commissioner.

Earlier this year, the President issued an order setting forth the following line of succession for Commissioner of Social Security:

Deputy Commissioner of Social Security (vacant)
Chief of Staff -- Larry Dye
Deputy Commissioner for Operations -- Linda McMahon
Regional Commissioner, Philadelphia -- Laurie Watkins
Regional Commissioner, Dallas -- Ramona Schuenemeyer

We may become very familiar with Mr. Dye next year, or maybe not, since he may not stay around Social Security if Barnhart leaves, or Bush could alter the succession order. Here is Dye's biography provided by NOSSCR:
Larry Dye, Chief of Staff, has worked in government and politics since 1971. His federal service includes more than 15 years on Capitol Hill. He has worked on both the House and Senate side of the Hill in a variety of capacities, including research assistant, executive assistant, professional committee staff, budget analyst and chief of staff. In the political realm, he has worked on a variety of campaigns. Larry is a sixth-generation Kentuckian and graduated from Centre College of Kentucky. He also was an Eagleton Fellow at Rutgers University before moving to Washington, D.C., to begin his first job at the Republican National Committee.
The important thing about this is that Dye is not a career Social Security employee. He is a long time Republican operative.

Aug 25, 2006

Video On Social Security Disability Hearings

Martin Kranitz of Annapolis, MD, who has done contract work for Social Security as a vocational expert witness, has sent out a press release promoting a video to help disability claimants prepare for hearings before Social Security Administrative Law Judges. The video is available for $37.95. Video clips are available online.

Aug 24, 2006

SSA Releases Monthly Stats

Social Security has issued its monthly statistical packages for Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act.

Aug 23, 2006

Social Security Budget

According to a Senate Appropriations Committee summary Social Security's budget for fiscal year (FY) 2007, which begins on October 1, 2006, has already been reported out of committee in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Social Security's budget is part of the Labor/HHS/Education Appropriation bill It has not yet come up on the floor in either house of Congress.

Here is the portion of the Senate Appropriations Committee Report dealing with Social Security.

Appropriations, 2006 1 $9,108,606,000
Budget estimate, 2007 9,494,000,000
House allowance 9,293,000,000
Committee recommendation 9,093,000,000
1 Excludes $38,000,000 in emergency supplemental appropriations enacted pursuant to Public Law 109-234.

The 2007 budget estimate is the amount recommended by the President. The House of Representatives cut that dramatically and the Senate is threatening to cut it even further.

The Senate Report includes the following language:
The Committee encourages SSA officials to educate adjudicators at all levels about the functional impact of CFS and the application of the April 1999 CFS ruling (99-2p) to ensure that adjudicators remain up to date on the evaluation of disability that results from this condition. The Committee encourages SSA to examine obstacles to benefits for persons with CFS and to keep medical information updated throughout all levels of the application and review process.

Aug 22, 2006

Stark Warning On Social Security Budget


Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, sent the following letter to Senator Robert Byrd, the Ranking Minority Member of the Senate Appropriations Committee on July 19:
I am writing to express my concern about the impact the funding included for Social Security in the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Appropriations bill will have on Social Security employees and service to the public. The subcommittee mark provides $9.093 billion to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for administrative expenses in Fiscal Year (FY) 2007. This represents a $401 million reduction from the President's FY 2007 request and is $54 million belowe the FY 2006 appropriation level.

This $401 million reduction means SSA would need to cut an additional 4,000 workyears beyond the budgeted 1 for 3 replacement level in FY 2006 and FY 2007. After implementing a staffing freeze and reducing overtime to minimum operating levels in SSA and the Disability Determination Services, achieving a $401 million reduction would require employee furloughs of approximately 10 days Agency-wide.

Without this funding, SSA will reduce the number of continuing disability reviews (CDRs) processed by 486,000 from a planned level of 597,000 to 111,000. CDRs save $10 for every $1 spent administering them, so this reduction would result in a significant increase in Federal spending.

SSA's administrative expenses are used to pay for the people needed to do the work, so fewer resources mean fewer people to serve the public in all areas of SSA's operations. Because these budget reductions will affect all employees, they will result in major service disruptions across all workloads. These include delays in the public's ability to file for retirement or disability benefits, apply for a replacement SSN card, reach a representative on our 800-number or obtain decisions on pending disability claims and appeals.

I appreciate the support you and Congress have given SSA in the past. However, as Commissioner of Social Security, I believe it is my responsibility to inform you that this reduction is too large and will result in furloughs and service reductions. Once again, I hope I can count on your support for the President's request for SSA. Please do not desitate to contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Dale Sopper, Deputy Commissioner for Budget, Finance and Management at (410) 965-2914.

Sincerely
Jo Anne B. Barnhart

OIG Newletter

Social Security's Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued its Summer 2006 newsletter, which contains, among other things, accounts of several criminal convictions for Social Security fraud that OIG obtained.

Aug 21, 2006

Number of Employees At Social Security

The Office of Personnel Management has an on-line database that tracks the number of employees by agency. Here is some data on the number of SSA employees as of certain months over the last few years:
September 1998 65,629
September 1999 63,957
September 2000 64,521
September 2001 65,377
September 2002 64,648
September 2003 64,903
September 2004 65,238
March, 2006 64,297
What this shows is that Social Security employment has remained relatively constant -- in the face of what is almost certainly the largest increase in the agency's workload since the 1930s, as baby boomers age into their prime years for disability claims. Disability claims are only a small fraction of the benefits paid by Social Security but account for more than half of Social Security's workload.

Aug 20, 2006

Nurse Case Manager Job Duties

The number of people being hired in the Disability Service Improvement (DSI) experiment as nurse case managers just for Region I -- 90 -- plus the job title, which is the term used in workers compensation and long term disability cases for personnel who often have an adversarial relationship with claimants leads to some concern about what Social Security is up to with Nurse Case Managers. Social Security has published a job announcement for more personnel to be hired for this position. The announcement gives the following job description:

Provides expert medical policy, procedural, and technical advice and guidance to DDSs, ROs, ALJs, the DRB, OQP and the national network of experts affiliated with the OMVE on the most complex issues encountered in making the determination or decision in a disability claim. This technical advice and guidance includes confirming what medical, psychological and vocational expertise is needed as well as verifying the need for additional medical or lay evidence, tests, or a consultative examination. Verifies that the request is in accordance with disability law, regulations, and policy.

Serves as a medical program expert and technical authority by providing technical advice on medical disability program issues, concerns, initiatives and requirements. Provides oral and written reports and conducts briefings on behalf of the Director to other SSA central office and regional components.

Provides expert medical advice and guidance for cases with multiple impairments to the DDSs, ROs, ALJs, DRB, OQP and the national network of medical and vocational experts.

This job description does not suggest that the Nurse Case Managers will have any direct contact with claimants, but it does suggest that the Nurse Case Managers may play something of an advocate's role in the process. They could be present at ALJ hearings, by video, to explain why the prior decision denying the claim was right. Still, the job description raises as many questions as it answers.


There is a worrisome history behind the idea of "case management" in the Social Security disability programs. The first recommendation that Social Security ought to have case managers that I can find came from Patricia Owens, formerly head of the Office of Disability Operations at Social Security and more recently an advisor to UNUM, the nation's largest Long Term Disability (LTD) insurer. She was pushing "case management" in 1999 in testimony to the House Social Security Subcommittee and she clearly had in mind people who would find a way to get claimants back to work, or at least off Social Security disability benefits.

The General Accounting Office, now the Government Accountability Office (GAO), picked up on this. The GAO testified, approvingly, in 2000 to the House Social Security Subcommittee about the practices of private long term disability insurance companies who were using nurse claim managers, among other personnel, to "encourage" recipients of long term disability (LTD) benefits under employee pension plans or under private insurance plans to return to work. GAO rehashed much the same subject in an early 2001 report. In 2002, in a report on disability determination at both Social Security and VA, GAO again urged "case management." None of the GAO reports acknowledged that the return to work "encouragement" was often perceived by the LTD recipients as harrassment aimed at lowering resistance to termination of benefits or that, in general, the insurance companies' handling of LTD claims has been extremely controversial in recent years.