Mar 3, 2007

Xenia Accountant Pleads Guilty

The Dayton Daily News reports that a Xenia, OH accountant has pleaded guilty to Social Security fraud. He had taken $116,000 in Social Security disability benefits despite working.

Mar 2, 2007

Time To File EAJA In Sentence Six Remands

This may seem impenetrable to most readers, but it is actually a fairly hot issue for attorneys who do much Social Security work in federal court. From the published opinion of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Van v. Barnhart, issued on February 26, 2007:

In this case, we consider whether in order to be deemed timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), a Social Security disability claimant who, following a remand under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), obtains a favorable determination from the agency and enforces it in the district court by a judgment to which the government consents must file an application for attorneys’ fees under EAJA within 30 days after the entry of judgment, or, whether he may file within 30 days following expiration of the 60-day appeal period provided for by Rule 4(a)(1)(B). We hold that such a claimant, like other successful sentence-six remand claimants, may file within 30 days after the 60-day appeal period in Rule 4(a) has expired. Thus, we reverse the district court and remand with instructions to consider Van’s fee application on the merits.

Man Burns Father's Body To Get Social Security Benefits

From WGCL:

A man who admitted burning his father's body a decade ago so the family could continue to cash his Social Security disability checks was sentenced to five months in prison and ordered to pay $133,000 in restitution. ...

Larry McWilliams died of natural causes on Jan. 13, 1997, at the family home's near Lewistown in northeast Missouri.

U.S. Attorney Catherine Hanaway said the family burned McWilliams' body to hide any evidence that he had died.

Betty McWilliams tended the fire to make sure no bones were left unburned, according to Hanaway. All three knew that Larry McWilliams' Social Security benefits would stop if his death was reported.

Rating Claimant's Attorneys

We are in the middle of a five year demonstration of allowing withholding of fees for non-attorney representatives of Social Security claimants. These non-attorneys must meet certain standards, which include passing a 50 question multiple choice exam. The demonstration also involves withholding of fees in SSI cases. The legislation that created this demonstration requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to do a study on non-attorney withholding and SSI withholding. It is already clear that SSI withholding is non-controversial. Non-attorney withholding remains controversial.

Someone who identifies himself or herself as "NC Rep" (and who is not me) reports on the SSAS Connect board that ALJs at the Charleston, SC hearing office have been completing individual evaluation forms on attorneys and non-attorney representatives appearing before them, apparently as part of the GAO study.

Mar 1, 2007

Upcoming Meetings and CLE

If you know of one that I have missed, please e-mail me at charles[at]charleshallfirm.com.

Optometrists As "Acceptable Medical Sources"

Social Security has published new final rules expanding the situations in which optometrists will be considered "acceptable medical sources" for disability determination. This will allow Social Security to make disability determinations without ordering unnecessary examinations by ophthalmologists (who are M.D.s) for claimants being treated by optometrists (who are not M.D.s) and may allow optometrists to do consultative examinations for Social Security.

Social Security Office On Lovers Lane?

From the Visalia (California) Times-Delta:
A southeast Visalia neighborhood is up in arms about a proposed 12,535-square-foot Social Security Administration building that is due to go up along Lovers Lane near Tulare Avenue.

"We had no idea this was going to be built here," said Kimberlie Tyler, 31, head of a large neighborhood organization that opposes the high-traffic office building being dropped into their neighborhood.

Historical Time Frame On Fee Cap Increase

Jo Anne Barnhart was confirmed as Commissioner of Social Security on November 2, 2001, according to the online biography that Social Security has on her.

About two months later, on January 8, 2002, Barnhart signed an order order raising the cap on the amount that attorneys may charge for representing Social Security claimants from $4,000 to $5,300. This order was published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2002.

The fee cap has not been raised since Barnhart did it five years ago.

Michael Astrue was confirmed on February 2, 2007. It is unclear whether Astrue will raise the fee cap at this point or ever. If he is going to do it, it is unlikely that he cares about doing it in the same time frame as his predecessor, but it is still interesting to have an historical reference point.