No Streaming Video On June 7 Social Security Subcommittee Hearing

It looks like I will not be missing the streaming video of the June 7 Social Security Subcommittee hearing anyway -- since it will not be available in streaming video or any other live format. The Subcommittee may make it available later in an audio format.

Allsup and AAPD?

I am not certain what this means. Allsup represents many Social Security disability claimants, mostly at the behest of long term disability insurance carriers who are interested in getting their insureds on benefits to offset the long term disability benefits they have to pay. However, Allsup is also interested in the retail business of representing Social Security disability claimants one at a time. Allsup may have entered into some sort of relationship with the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD), which bills itself as 100,000 member organization. According to a press release from Allsup some of the leadership of AAPD made a trip to Allsup headquarters. AAPD may be a big deal, but I have not previously heard of them. AAPD's website contains a few -- not many -- links suggesting that they have relationships with some other for profit businesses. I do not see it on Allsup's website at the moment, but in the past Allsup offered a cash bonus to anyone who steered a Social Security disability case their way.

By the way, Allsup's website touts a 97% success rate.

Witness List For Social Security Subcommittee Hearing -- And, Can I Get A Volunteer?

The House Social Security Subcommittee has issued the following tentative witness list for its hearing on Thursday, June 7 on Employment Eligibility Verification Systems at Social Security.

Frederick G. Streckewald, Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Program Policy Office of Disability and Income Security Programs, Social Security Administration

Steve Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for the Office of Audit, Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General

Richard Stana, Director of Homeland Security and Justice, Government Accountability Office

Tyler Moran, Employment Policy Director, National Immigration Law Center, Boise, Idaho

Angelo I. Amador, Director of Immigration Policy, U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Sue Meisinger, The Human Resource Initiative for a Legal Workforce, Society for Human Resource Management, Alexandria, Virginia

Peter Neumann, Principal Scientist, Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, on behalf of U.S. Public Policy Committee of the Association for Computing Machinery

Marc Rotenberg, Executive Director, Electronic Privacy Information Center

This may sound awfully boring, but it is important. If, as now appears very possible, everyone in the country will have to go to their local Social Security office to get a new Social Security card card which includes a photograph and will have to do so on a regular basis in the future, the Social Security Administration will be dramatically transformed. The manpower requirements for such a role will certainly be in the tens of thousands. I know there are many issues associated with "employment verification", but I hope at least one of the witnesses will focus upon the impact upon the Social Security Administration of using the Social Security card as a national ID card.

The hearing will be available in streaming video. Unfortunately, I will be trying to earn a living while this Congressional hearing is going on. Would anyone be interested in watching and writing up a summary that I can post? I will be happy to give credit for this or to post it without a named source. If interested, please use the Feedback form on the right side of the page.

Schenectady Daily Gazette On Backlogs

Some excerpts from a Schenectady Daily Gazette article. No link is possible since there is no on-line edition of the paper. At the rate we are going every newspaper in the country will do a story along these lines.

Twenty-three-year-old Christina Doty waited three years to hear that she would be receiving a monthly check from the federal government for the rest of her life, and would never have to work again....

"It was hard to keep a job," recalled Doty, a Schenectady resident whose husband is also disabled. "With my education level, nobody wanted me. My bipolar disorder and anxiety made it hard for me to be around a lot of people. Standing for eight hours a day was painful."

Yet her application for Supplemental Security Income ... had been denied three times. She kept appealing, but the wait, which began in 2004, seemed interminable. ...

The Social Security Administration acknowledges that the wait is too long, and that they are trying to find ways to expedite the application process and reduce the ever-mounting backlog of cases waiting for a hearing decision. ...

"It's all too high," said Mark Lassiter, a spokesman for the Social Security Administration.

"Informal" Remands Have Begun

I have heard that at least in North Carolina the "informal" remands or "re-recons" have begun. These are cases awaiting an Administrative Law Judge hearing which are selected by a computer formula to be sent back for a new look at the reconsideration level. Something like 2% of pending requests for hearing are being returned at this time for a new look at the reconsideration level. If no favorable action is possible on the new reconsideration review, the cases will be returned to the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review for a hearing, probably without the claimant ever knowing of the review.

"Streamlined" Hearing Files -- Bates Stamping Only

I am hearing that the "streamlined" hearing files that Commissioner Astrue was referring to in his appearance before the Senate Finance Committee will have "Bates stamping" only. ""Bates stamping" refers to sequentially numbering each page of a section of a Social Security hearing file -- but without removing duplicate records or attempting to place the records in any sort of logical order. However, it is not clear to me that this is completely mandatory.

In the past, when Administrative Law Judges heard cases on unpulled files, the files were "pulled" if the claim was to be denied. Apparently, there will never be any true pulling of exhibits with these "streamlined" files. The Appeals Council and District Courts should beware. They will not like the looks of these files.

This would help explain the plan for a computer program to "pull" exhibits in scanned files. A program which does no more than stamp a number on each page is no great feat. It appears that Social Security is abandoning "pulling" exhibits, perhaps permanently.

House Appropriations Set To Take Up Social Security As Republicans Look For Veto

The Disability Policy Collaboration's Capital Insider reports that the House Appropriations Committee will markup the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill on June 7. This is the appropriations bill that includes Social Security. The markup is being done without any hearing about Social Security's budget. I do not know what the lack of a hearing means, but it surprises me. Has this ever happened before?

The Capital Insider also reports that Republicans in the House of Representatives are circulating a letter in hopes of obtaining enough signatures of Republicans who will vote to sustain a veto by President Bush of any spending bill that exceeds the spending levels in the President's budget. This could bring about extended fights over many appropriations bills.

Results Of Last Week's Unscientific Poll

Barnhart versus Astrue
How effective is Michael Astrue as Commissioner of Social Security compared to his predecessor, Jo Anne Barnhart?

Astrue definitely more effective (10)	10%
Astrue a bit more effective than Barnhart (10)	10%
About the same (12)	11%
Barnhart was a bit more effective (1)	1%
Barnhart was definitely more effective (16)	15%
Depends upon what you mean by effective (29)	28%
Don't know (27)	26%

Total Votes: 105