Jun 3, 2008
Fraud Allegation In PA
From the Pittsburg Tribune-Review:
A federal grand jury in Pittsburgh has indicted a Fayette County man on a charge of Social Security fraud.Shawn R. Johnson, 27, of Uniontown, is accused of failing to tell the Social Security Administration that he was hired by a Hopwood carpeting company and was receiving income that would have affected his continued rights to receive Supplemental Security Income benefits.
The indictment was handed down after an investigation by the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General.
New ALJs In Wichita
From the Hays Daily News of Kansas:
The number of administrative law judges in the Wichita Office of Disability Adjudication and Review increased from five to seven in April when two new administrative law judges were added as part of a Social Security Administration initiative to hire 175 additional judges this fiscal year, according to Melvin Werner, chief administrative law judge in the Wichita hearing office.The new judges, Alison K. Brookins and Michael A. Lehr, will conduct hearings and make decisions on appeals involving retirement, survivors, disability and Supplemental Security Income cases from the Social Security offices in Hays, Wichita, Hutchinson, Manhattan, Independence, Emporia, Salina and Dodge City, according to Judge Werner.
"I am very pleased to have two new judges of their legal experience and backgrounds join us here in Wichita," he said. "This is good news for disability claimants and others who file appeals with Social Security."
Judge Alison K. Brookins received her law degree from Washburn University School of Law in 1985. She was in private practice until 1991, when she joined the Wichita Hearing Office as an adviser.
Judge Michael A. Lehr received his law degree from the University of Missouri School of Law, Kansas City, Mo., in 1993. Prior to joining Social Security as an assistant regional counsel in Kansas City in 1997, Lehr worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Kansas City, Kan.
Jun 2, 2008
New Regs On Reps Coming
The Social Security Administration has filed two items with the Office of Management and Budget seeking approval to publish them in the Federal Register as proposed regulations. One is entitled "Authorization of Representative Fees", but no further description is available so far.
The second item is more fully described:
The second item is more fully described:
| SSA | RIN: 0960-AG56 | Publication ID: Spring 2008 |
| Title: Representation of Parties (3396P) | |
| Abstract: We are proposing several revisions to our rules on Representation of Parties. These proposed rules would recognize entities as representatives, mandate the use of Form 1696 to appoint or revoke the appointment of a representative, define the roles of a principal representative and a professional representative, require professional representatives to file Form 1696 electronically, and require a representative to keep paper copies of certain documents that we may require. We are proposing these revisions to reflect changes in representatives' business practices and to become more efficient in processing claims for benefits. |
This second item has potentially dramatic effects upon the practice of representing Social Security claimants. While it would simplify matters for the many law firms and other entities employing more than one attorney or representative, its biggest effect would be upon the largest entities representing Social Security claimants, namely Allsup and Binder and Binder, both of which are regarded warily by most who represent Social Security claimants. This would dramatically advance the interests of those who wish to nationalize the representation of Social Security disability claimants.
More Nonsense From GAO
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report entitled "Federal Disability Programs: More Strategic Coordination Could Help Overcome Challenges to Needed Transformation." You can tell immediately just from the title where we are going with this one: Everything is the fault of those stupid bureaucrats.
Here is the GAO's summary:
The belief that more disabled people could return to work if Social Security would just adopt enlightened rules is ridiculous. Cannot GAO see the enormous failure of Ticket to Work and draw the obvious conclusion? If the program is set up to pay benefits only to those who are half dead or fully nuts, why would anyone expect many people drawing disability benefits to return to work?
This report seems to be based upon the implicit assumption that disabled people are mostly wheelchair bound people. If you know nothing about disability, that must seem like a natural assumption. After all, a wheelchair is used as the very symbol of disability. The reality is otherwise. Pain and mental illness are the most important causes of disability. People in wheelchairs are only a small part of the disabled population.
It is time to stop being polite about the well-meaning fools at GAO. If this report is the best that GAO can do, it is time to ask whether GAO is a waste of money.
Here is the GAO's summary:
SSA and VA have taken some initial steps to recognize a more modern concept of disability, but both agencies still encounter challenges in fully assessing an individual’s capacity to work and in addressing claims processing problems. SSA and VA have revised some eligibility criteria to reflect medical advances and to support beneficiaries’ efforts to return to work and achieve self-sufficiency. However, their revisions to eligibility criteria fall short of fully incorporating a modern understanding of how technology and labor market changes should impact eligibility for disability benefits and return-to-work rates remain low. The low return-to-work rates may be due, in part, to the timing in which certain supports are offered to beneficiaries. However, the timing of services are constrained by several factors, including program design, laws, and the agencies’ limited span of authority over benefits and services offered by other agencies. Finally, although SSA and VA are taking steps to address management challenges, both agencies continue to experience delays in processing disability claims and persistent backlogs.What is "a more modern concept of disability"? I think they mean that they want Social Security to deny more disability claims because modern medicine is so miraculous and employment opportunities are so great for disabled people. If this is what they mean, they are naive. Modern medicine has not conquered pain. Modern medicine cannot halt the aging process or prevent the progressive nature of chronic illnesses such as diabetes and osteoarthritis. Modern psychiatry has not conquered schizophrenia and does little for many suffering from bipolar disorder. Employment opportunities mean nothing when you are in severe pain or so ravaged by mental illness that you cannot show up for work regularly, stay at work once you get there, keep your mind on your job or get along with co-workers and supervisors.
The belief that more disabled people could return to work if Social Security would just adopt enlightened rules is ridiculous. Cannot GAO see the enormous failure of Ticket to Work and draw the obvious conclusion? If the program is set up to pay benefits only to those who are half dead or fully nuts, why would anyone expect many people drawing disability benefits to return to work?
This report seems to be based upon the implicit assumption that disabled people are mostly wheelchair bound people. If you know nothing about disability, that must seem like a natural assumption. After all, a wheelchair is used as the very symbol of disability. The reality is otherwise. Pain and mental illness are the most important causes of disability. People in wheelchairs are only a small part of the disabled population.
It is time to stop being polite about the well-meaning fools at GAO. If this report is the best that GAO can do, it is time to ask whether GAO is a waste of money.
SSAB Produces Issue Brief On SSI
The Social Security Advisory Board (SSAB) has issued its Issue Brief #4 entitled, "Need For Review of the Supplemental Security Income Program’s Benefit Levels, Asset Limits, and Income Exclusions."
Here is the report's bottom line:
I do not see the idea of treating unmarried people living together as if they were married as realistic. It would be unenforceable. Is Social Security going to have police checking to see if someone is staying in your home or apartment with you? Many years ago that was how the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program worked, but that was scrapped because it was unworkable.
Here is the report's bottom line:
Calling merely for a "re-examination" of the SSI income exclusions and asset limits is hardly a bold step since the income exclusions and asset limits are absurdly out of date. I suppose we should be happy to get even such a hedged recommendation.Our specific recommendations are, as part of a comprehensive legislative review of the SSI program:
• The Congress should consider how equivalence scales could be applied to the SSI benefit structure. Those scales should be applied to households regardless of the marital status of the members of the households.
• Research should be conducted to develop equivalence scales that would reflect the additional needs of beneficiaries with disabilities.
• Income exclusions and asset limits should be re-examined to ensure that they still serve the purposes for which they were developed.
I do not see the idea of treating unmarried people living together as if they were married as realistic. It would be unenforceable. Is Social Security going to have police checking to see if someone is staying in your home or apartment with you? Many years ago that was how the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program worked, but that was scrapped because it was unworkable.
Jun 1, 2008
Fee Payment Stats
Social Security has finally issued updated statistics on payments of fees to attorneys and others for representing Social Security claimants.
As I say every time I post these stats, they are an analogue for the payment of benefits to claimants, since the attorney and claimant are generally paid at the same time. Surges and lulls in payments of these fees reflect surges and lulls in payment of benefits to Social Security claimants -- and, yes, there are dramatic surges and lulls, as those who compute and authorize payment of these benefits are called away from the regular jobs to answer Social Security's 800 number calls, a phenomenon which is referred to as "spiking." Here are the stats so far this year:
As I say every time I post these stats, they are an analogue for the payment of benefits to claimants, since the attorney and claimant are generally paid at the same time. Surges and lulls in payments of these fees reflect surges and lulls in payment of benefits to Social Security claimants -- and, yes, there are dramatic surges and lulls, as those who compute and authorize payment of these benefits are called away from the regular jobs to answer Social Security's 800 number calls, a phenomenon which is referred to as "spiking." Here are the stats so far this year:
Fee Payments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Month/Year | Volume | Amount |
Jan-08 | 20,559 | $75,368,163.45 |
| Feb-08 | 26,570 | $95,228,284.32 |
Mar-08 | 23,088 | $83,166,027.02 |
Apr-08 | 27,296 | $98,616,579.78 |
Buffalo News Editorial
The Buffalo News, which has been closely covering the story of the backlogs and delays caused by Social Security's inadequate staffing ran an editorial yesterday, again calling for the agency to hire needed employees.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)