Nov 3, 2018

SSA To Pay $12.4 Million For Early Intervention

     From a contracting notice recently posted by the Social Security Administration:
:
$12,378,342.00...

:
MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH, INC.
1100 1ST STREET NE
12TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON
DC
200024221
USA
 
: ... 
Single Award Cost Plus Fixed Fee 5-year Contract for Retaining Employment & Talent After Injury/Illness Network (RETAIN) Evaluation - This is a joint project between SSA, the Department of Labor (DOL), and several states. The purpose of the contract is to evaluate the impact of the various interventions implemented under cooperative agreements between the states and the DOL.
     I hope this study shows that early intervention works but let me list just a few of the reasons I don't think it will work very well:
  • Most people who become disabled are disabled by degenerative conditions, like diabetes or osteoarthritis. These conditions just get worse with time. Rehabilitating people with this sort of problem isn't realistic. As soon as you get them able to do a new job, their condition has worsened to the point they can't do it.
  • Pain is a huge factor in producing disability.  No intervention can take away the pain. If pain prevents one type of work, it's almost certain to prevent other types of work.
  • Mental illness is a major cause of disability. It’s not so amenable to intervention that  helps to preserve the ability to work.
  • People with below average cognitive abilities are dramatically over-represented among the population of people who apply for Social Security disabilities. That's because their limited intellectual abilities limit them to simpler, more physically demanding work to begin with and make it almost impossible for them to switch to other less demanding work. 
  • This whole concept is based upon a misunderstanding of who applies for Social Security disability benefits and why they apply. Those who support this think that most disability is due to trauma and that if you can just help people figure out what they can do despite their injuries and give them a mobility scooter or whatever that they can go back to work. The thing is that the 12 month duration of disability requirement in the definition of disability that is written into the Social Security Act means that folks who are disabled by trauma either go back to their old jobs or figure out something else they can do on their own or with the help of programs that already exist well before 12 months have passed. I don't know that there's anything new that can be offered to help people in this situation. If you wanted to do something useful, you could better fund state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Besides, it's such a small component of disability that it doesn't matter that much anyway.
  • In any case, as far as I'm concerned, Mathematica is nothing more than a Beltway Bandit. They get lots and lots of government contracting money but nothing they do ever helps anyone.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The study that would make sense would be to get a good picture of the demographics and types of disability reflecting the greatest rehab potential, based on actual employment after disability. Add which interventions are typically are most successful. Then set your expectations really low, to reflect the reality of the situation. Let's say 1-2% of disability beneficiaries tops, with a pretty high failure rate to where only 0.5% to 1% more would return to work. That might be achievable by identifying the right candidates and providing appropriate extra support.

At best such a study would likely just restate what good Vocational Rehabilitation agencies already know and likely already have data on. At worst, we'll get a multi-million dollar report that goes off on a tangent and recommends "further study."

Anonymous said...

I might add those little buggers spam disability recipients with mail pieces that imply they are looking to assist recovery when they are apparently just hoping the recipients are naive enough to answer their questionnaires and give them free data points they can monetize. Disability Attorney’s, thank you for advocating for the marginalized and as an added non- bonus not being compensated nearly enough.

Anonymous said...

Todays modern work does not require the same physicality of prior generations, it does take training and actual skills. Many people on disability get hung up on not doing the old job they did and are highly reluctant to train into new skills or fields. America is paying the price for allowing people to be proud that they are poorly educated.

Anonymous said...

9:17, you do realize most employers do not want to hire disabled ppl. Look how hard it is for able bodied ppl to find work, even with the education and training!

Anonymous said...

At 10:01 there is a job out there for anyone that really wants one. Employers are pining for skilled workers in many fields and cannot fill the openings they have. Unemployment rate is at 3.7%, your argument is about a decade behind the times.