Probably most readers of this blog have tried using AI at least to some extent. Some may be using it a lot. How much use can the Social Security Administration get out of AI? I’m generally skeptical if not hostile to the idea but I’m old. What do you think? Are you already using AI for Social Security purposes? How well does it work for you? For that matter, to what extent is AI even available to agency employees? Is ChatGPT blocked on Social Security computers?
4 comments:
Nothing wrong with being a dinosaur! Senior citizens have the money and power to dictate policy. I only use my credit card for big item purchases. AI is getting out of hand and it’s very dangerous on how much individuals rely on it. Ask any college graduate how the job
AI is not perfect but neither are ALJs and decision writers (I know that will come as a shock to a few of them). The thing that would make AI superior to them is the lack of bias. Of course, the agency would like program it in such a way, as they do with ALJs, that decisions would continue to lack support by any evidence based or science based research such as the current policy of putting anyone with problems using their hands, no matter the severity, at frequent handling and fingering. At least an AI would have the excuse of the way it is programmed. What excuse do ALJ's have?
AI will eventually eliminate most decision writers but no time soon. Our “tech” is terrible from laptops to case processing to time and attendance. Eventually, though, you will have judges using AI to draft most cases.
Will AI, in writing unfavorable decisions, cite to hallucinated evidence?
Post a Comment