







PANEL:
- Barbara Bovbjerg, Managing Director for Education, Workforce and Income Security Issues, Government Accountability Office
- Joe Dirago, Manager, Social Security Administration Newburgh Field Office and President, National Council of Social Security Management Associations, Newburgh, New York
- Billie Armenta, District Manager, Social Security Administration Phoenix Downtown District Office and Secretary, National Council of Social Security ManagementAssociations, Phoenix, Arizona
- Witold Skwierczynski, President, National Council of SSA Field Operations Locals, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Baltimore, Maryland
- Daniel Woosley, Generalist Claims Representative, Social Security Administration Louisville West Field Office and Executive Vice President of Kentucky Local 3984,
- National Council of SSA Field Operations Locals, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Louisville, Kentucky
- The Honorable Patrick P. O’Carroll, Inspector General, Social Security Administration
PANEL:
- The Honorable Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
We cannot imagine the suffering not only from debilitating pain but from the extreme wait times for hearings on applications for Social Security Disability Insurance. The average wait in Florida stands at 470 days.
That is unconscionable. And unacceptable.
Sarasota resident Thomas Presha’s fate is worse. He’s been waiting more than two years for a hearing before a Social Security Administration administrative law judge. ...
How can a civilized society let that happen? ...
Presha’s Bradenton attorney, Terri F. Cromley, calls the current setup a “horrible process,” one that has left many of her clients homeless. ...
Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Tampa, has the right idea. She’s pushing legislation that would force the SSA to schedule a hearing within five business days of receiving a request, actually holding the hearing between 60 to 75 days later, and then issuing a decision within another 15 days of the hearing. That’s far more reasonable and certainly more humane. ...
This is a national disgrace. Congress should pass Castor’s measure, and President Obama should sign it into law.
From the Bismark Tribune:
And there is a related story on local television.Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D. [the chairman of the House Social Security Subcommittee], met with local Social Security Administration officials to talk about the future of the program.
Pomeroy’s subcommittee on Social Security is hosting a meeting on the subject this week, and the congressman has held a few such roundtables in North Dakota as preparation, part of what he calls a listening tour. ...
Facing the Social Security Administration are major staffing problems, where the force is decreasing as the pool of claimants is getting larger. Pomeroy said he’s heard from a number of staffers that retirees are not being replaced fast enough to meet customer service demands and that phones at the office are constantly busy because there just aren’t enough people to answer them. ...
He blames the inability to fund more Social Security jobs on cuts from Congress during the Bush administration, but said that an announcement by the Social Security commissioner that the agency would add 900 new jobs can at least partially be attributed to pressure from his committee.
The objective of this evaluation was to determine the financial impact to the Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs as a result of conducting fewer full medical continuing disability reviews (CDR). ...
SSA employs a profiling system that uses data from SSA’s records to determine the likelihood of medical improvement for disabled beneficiaries. SSA selects beneficiaries’ records profiled as having a high likelihood of medical improvement for a full medical review by disability determination services (DDS). Beneficiaries profiled as having a medium or low likelihood of medical improvement are sent a mailer questionnaire. If the completed mailer questionnaire indicates medical improvement, SSA will send the case to the DDS for a full medical review. ...According to SSA, resource limitations and increases in its core workloads prevented it from conducting full medical CDRs when they became due. As a result, SSA estimates a backlog of over 1.5 million full medical CDRs will exist at the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2010.
SSA has made, and will continue to make, benefit payments to individuals who would no longer be eligible if the backlog of 1.5 million full medical CDRs had been conducted when they became due.
• From Calendar Year (CY) 2005 through CY 2010, we estimate SSA will have made benefit payments of between $1.3 and $2.6 billion that could have potentially been avoided if the full medical CDRs in the backlog had been conducted when they became due (see Appendix C).• Although SSA plans to conduct an increased number of full medical CDRs in FY 2011, the 1.5-million full medical CDR backlog will most likely remain. Therefore, we estimate SSA will pay between $556 million and $1.1 billion during CY 2011 that could have potentially been avoided if the full medical CDRs in the backlog had been conducted when they became due (see Appendix C). ...
We estimate SSA could potentially identify lifetime Federal benefit savings of almost $15.8 billion if it had the resources to conduct all 1.5 million full medical CDRs in FY 2010.
Fee Payments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Month/Year | Volume | Amount |
Jan-10 | 32,227 | $111,440,046.23 |
Feb-10 | 29,914 | $105,708,101.59 |
Mar-10 | 34,983 | $122,874,426.87 |