Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) has authored an op ed for a Maine newspaper opposing office closings and the elimination of face to face contact at Social Security. However, she doesn't say anything about additional appropriations for the agency. Reading the piece, you get the impression that the only problem is foolish decisions made at the Social Security Administration. Republicans either actively deny that there's a link between appropriations and agency operations or they just ignore the issue altogether.
Jul 8, 2014
The Assault On The Colvin Nomination Has Begun In Earnest
Widespread abuses within the Social Security Administration’s disability system are becoming a point of contention as the Senate weighs the nomination of Carolyn Watts Colvin as the agency’s commissioner.
Some congressional Democrats have already taken issue with Colvin, who has served as the acting commissioner since February 2013, because she presided over staffing cuts and field-office closures. And earlier this week, Republican members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform wrote a letter harshly criticizing Colvin. “We’d expect that [Colvin] will be pressed on her track record, including the agency’s allowance of hundreds of [administrative-law judges] to rubber-stamp claimants onto disability over the past decade,” says Becca Glover Watkins, the communications director for the committee.I think we can now say that the right wing assault on Colvin's nomination has begun in earnest. There will be two major lines of attack. First, service at Social Security is terrible. Field offices are closing It must be Colvin's fault. The real problem is Social Security's operating budget, set by Congress but Colvin has already made the mistake of failing to really call out Congress on this, setting herself up to take the blame. Second, Social Security disability is full of fraud. It must be Colvin's fault. The attacks on Social Security disability are ridiculous but if you keep throwing mud at it, some of it sticks.
Jul 7, 2014
Senate Finance Committee Hearing On Disability Benefits Coming This Month
From Greg Sargent, writing for the Washington Post:
Democrats are bracing for a new assault from Republicans on the safety net that could come as early as this month — in particular, on disability insurance. ...
Senator Orrin Hatch has requested a Finance Committee hearing into Social Social Security Disability Insurance — whose trust fund is set to be depleted soon — and Dems on the committee have agreed. It may take place this month, before the August recess. ...
Republicans such as Senator Tom Coburn have argued that the disability program is being “gamed” by “scalawags,” and that a third of claims are bogus, putting the program in financial trouble.
A View Of The Future?
From The Globe and Mail of Toronto:
Some Canadians who believe they have been wrongly denied federal disability benefits are being told, under new rules, that they have no right to plead their case directly to the adjudicator of the new Social Security Tribunal who will decide their appeal. ...
[I]n April 2013, the Conservative government eliminated the roughly 350 part-time members of those panels [hearing disability claims] ...
They were replaced by 35 full-time members of the new Social Security Tribunal (SST) which, despite inheriting a backlog of 7,224 cases, managed to hear just 348 appeals in its first year of operation. By last month, the backlog had grown to nearly 10,000, some of them dating back several years.
New rules introduced when the SST was created allowed adjudicators to hear cases by teleconference, video conference, in person, or by written question and answer. But the adjudicators could also decide, unilaterally, that the written material given to them by the claimants and the government was sufficient and that no further live input was necessary.
In the first 13 months of the SST’s operation, 57 cases were decided on the basis of the existing written record alone. In the same period, 173 appeals were heard by teleconference, 52 by video conference and 123 were done in person.
Dominique Forget, the senior director of the tribunal, said in a telephone interview on Friday: “It’s a question of flexibility and efficiency.” Appellants can express their preference, she said, but “we’re trying to move files and to be as quick as we can.” ...
Jul 6, 2014
Making Demands
Darrell Issa, the Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has sent an amazing letter to the Acting Commissioner of Social Security making harsh accusations and strident demands. I don't think I've ever read anything like this directed at Social Security.
I have no idea whether this portends anything for Acting Commissioner Colvin's nomination to become Commissioner for real.
I guarantee that if she submits to these demands that some very different demands will be made at whatever in the future when Democrats control that Committee.
Jul 5, 2014
Jul 4, 2014
New List Of Charges
Social Security has a new schedule of charges for "non-program-related" requests for agency records -- and please note that these charges do not apply to situations such as a claimant or his or her attorney seeking access to records in order to pursue their claim:
- 1. Copying a fully electronic folder (burning CDROM) – ($49)
- · Includes transferring information from an individual’s electronic folder to a compact disc (CD)
· Whether the request is for the entire claims file or one document from the claims file, such as the Consultative Examination Report, charge the requester $49.
· When multiple claims files exist (i.e., claimant filed for benefits more than once) and a CD is burned for each claims file, only charge the requester $49 for each request, not $49 for each CD.
· National 800 Number Network (N8NN) agents should refer these requesters to the FO. Provide the FO address and business number to the requester.
- · Includes duplicating a
copy of a beneficiary’s information that is still partially or fully in
a paper format rather than an electronic format · Whether the request is
for the entire claims file or one document from the claims file, such
as the Consultative Examination Report, charge the requester $86.
· This fee also applies to cases when we must produce a paper copy of an electronic folder. For example, for the purpose of certification, we would still add the cost of certification to the final fee.
· N8NN agents should refer these requesters to the FO. Provide the FO address and business number to the requester.
- · The SSN verifications we provide in local field offices for third parties and are chargeable services · These verifications do
not include automated verification services such as Social Security
Number Verification Service (SSNVS), Enumeration Verification Service
(EVS), or Consent Based SSN Verification (CBSV).
· Excludes manual SSN verifications for first-party requesters
· This is not limited to printouts (i.e., SSN Printout or “Numi-Lite”) and can include letters, completing forms, or other methods of providing SSN verifications.
· N8NN agents should refer these requesters to the FO. Provide the FO address and business number to the requester.
- · Requested by individual requesters who need us to certify records that are generally for court purposes
· Typically, requests come from the Government Accountability Office, U.S. or private attorneys, copy service companies, SSN holders or their representatives.
· A designated SSA official signs the records certifying the records are true and exact copies of the information contained in our records. (See GN 03360.025)
· A grommet, ribbon, and seal, bind the certified records.
- · We frequently receive requests for certification of earnings records.
· Typical requests come from other government agencies (i.e. Department of Treasury (TD), Department of Justice (DOJ)), number holders, or their legal representative for litigation matters.
· A designated SSA official signs the records certifying the records are true and exact copies of the earnings information contained in our records.
· A grommet, ribbon, and seal, bind the certified records.
- · Employers,
individuals, or third parties request copies of employer reports (W-2
and W-3 Wage Reports) for program and non-program purposes. · We charge for non-program-related requests that do not directly relate to the administration of a program under the Act.
7. Record extract – Field Office (FO) – ($33)
- · Any requests for any
entitlement or status information including current benefit amount,
payment history, Medicare entitlement, and status of claim or appeal.
· Whether the request is for one item (i.e., date of filing) or multiple items, charge the requester $33.
· This includes providing benefit verifications for third-party requesters printed from PCOM. Exception: We do not charge first-party requesters for benefit or SSN verifications.
· This may include completion of questionnaires or documents with fill-ins.
· We extract information from a number of systems, including MBR, SSID, DDSQ, MCS, or MSSICS.
· This includes queries. Each query will cost $33.00. Thus, if a requester needs an MBR and SSID for the same client, the cost will be $66.00.
· N8NN agents should refer these requesters to the FO. Provide the FO address and business number to the requester.
Jul 3, 2014
How Long Should It Take To Replace A Stolen Social Security Check?
Dominic Daniel's Social Security check was stolen. It only took about a year and the help of a local television station for him to be reimbursed for the missing money.
Please, don't give any silly lectures about the need for direct deposit. It shouldn't take this long to resolve this sort of problem regardless of how the money is supposed to come in. In any case, there's probably at least as much risk of a direct deposit of Social Security funds being fraudulently redirected from a person's bank account as there is of a check being stolen. At least stolen checks are easily traced. This is just bad service.
Also, by the way, note the description of Dominic in the article. He's got poor hearing and cannot speak. We can't tell for sure from the article but he's probably receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) child's benefits. There are persistent reports that SSI child's benefits are paid to children who have nothing much wrong with them. That's not accurate. Dominic is the reality of SSI child benefits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)