Maybe Republicans Don't Really Want Sequestration
From
The Hill:
House Republican defense hawks are pushing back strongly against Speaker
John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) claim that he has GOP support to allow steep
automatic budget cuts to take effect if President Obama does not agree
to replace them with other reductions. ...
“I don’t support that,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), a member of
the Armed Services Committee whose district includes one of the nation’s
largest military installations. “You get into dangerous territory when
you talk about using national security as a bargaining chip with the
president.” ...
The Speaker suggested the sequester was a stronger leverage point for
Republicans than the upcoming deadline to raise the debt ceiling ...
“In order to get the Republican Conference to pass the debt-limit
increase last time, he promised them sequestration would not go in
place,” the Republican House member said, speaking on the condition of
anonymity. “To be using sequestration and these defense cuts in the next
debt-limit talks certainly is pretty bad déjà vu for the Republican
Conference.”
5 comments:
Obama would welcome sequestration--he gets to gut the defense budget, which plays to his base, and he gets to blame the Republicans for the cuts in social programs, which the media will go nuts over. All part of the plan.
Wrong. "Gutting" the defense budget would mean layoffs and more unemployment. It isn't in Obama's interest to let that happen.
thin out the bloated and overpaid defense contractor herd. hire back many of them as DoD, etc. employees to do whatever actually needs to be done. This is one thing (the only thing?) AFGE is dead-on about.
Obama does not care about layoffs and unemployment. He got re-elected despite them, and is not running for re-election again. It's all about the agenda--weaken America.
It is none but Obama's great policy of winning reelection.
Feel free to visit security service
Post a Comment