The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has given Social Security a stay in the Steigerwald v. Saul class action lawsuit.
Steigerwald has to do with the computation of benefits to which a claimant
is entitled in a case where Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are both approved and the claimant
is represented. To oversimplify, the needs based SSI benefits are
supposed to be reduced because of the DIB payments. However, a
represented claimant does not receive the entire DIB payment because
some of it is used to pay the attorney. Should the SSI benefits be
reduced by money the claimant never sees because it's used to pay the
attorney? The answer is no but Social Security had been failing to do it that way which led to the class action lawsuit.
The District Court had given Social Security only until September 25, 2019 to do the redeterminations. The Court of Appeals has given Social Security two years.
My opinion is that while the September 25, 2019 date was unrealistic, two years is way too long. Social Security should have known that it was going to lose Steigerwald from the day it was filed some two years ago. They had already lost another class action on this issue many years ago. Social Security should have gotten going far earlier. Foot dragging shouldn't be rewarded.