May 13, 2007
Social Security Ticket to Work Meeting
May 12, 2007
Send Feedback To Social Security News
May 11, 2007
Empire Justice Center Publishes Benefits Management Manual For Working People With Disabilities
A practical, comprehensive and affordable reference book which covers the many aspects of how work activity affects a person’s right to Social Security, SSI, Medicaid and Medicare. This is our twelfth edition of the Manual and the 2007 version is the best ever.
The Manual contains the latest citations to all relevant Social Security laws, regulations, policies and selected case law, with many tips to assist advocates through this maze of regulation and policy. The Manual is written in an outline format which makes it easy to use as a reference book. Many examples are used to illustrate various points and forms are included to show how to develop a PASS proposal and calculate the amount of an SSI check. The Manual is a handy resource tool whether you are an advocate, rehabilitation counselor or consumer.
Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits are governed by federal law, regulation and policy. Therefore, the material in the Manual applies to every state of the country.
ABOUT THE EDITORS
Edwin J. López-Soto is a 1981 graduate of Cornell Law School and is a former Staff Attorney with the Greater Upstate Law Project, Inc., in Rochester, New York, where he provided research, technical and litigation support to attorneys and paralegals for more than 15 years, as part of a statewide Social Security advocacy project. Currently, he is employed by Cornell University’s Program on Employment and Disability as a lead trainer and technical assistance specialist.
James R. Sheldon, Jr. is a 1978 graduate of the University at Buffalo Law School and is Supervising Attorney of the Disability Law Unit at Neighborhood Legal Services in Buffalo, New York. Mr. Sheldon currently supervises three work incentives projects, including a regional Work Incentives Planning and Assistance Project. With Mr. López, he is the co-editor/author of The Benefits Planner, a quarterly newsletter on SSI and SSDI work incentives.*
* Available at www.nls.org/tocplanr.htm
Social Security Posts Attorney Fee Payments Data
Fee Payments | ||
---|---|---|
Month/Year | Volume | Amount |
Jan-07 | 15,331 | $55,149,991.81 |
Feb-07 | 19,301 | $69,731,683.72 |
Mar-07 | 26,505 | $94,396,916.02 |
Apr-07 | 26,889 | $96,650,134.82 |
Social Security Employees Beware Of Rudolph Giuliani's Workforce Plans
ALJs And CLE
ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, INC.
Henry Reuss Federal Plaza, Suite 880
310 W. Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wl 53203
April 23, 2007
The Honorable Frank Cristaudo
Chief Judge
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Social Security Administration
One Skyline Tower, Suite 1500
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Re: OPM Final Rule Regarding Bar Status of Administrative Law Judges
Dear Chief Judge Cristaudo:
Effective April 19, 2007, Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") issued a Final Rule that requires active state bar membership as a qualification for service by incumbent Administrative Law Judges. Although we have had discussions with OPM regarding our objections to the Final Rule, and we have instituted a legal challenge to the Final Rule, there are several practical questions regarding the implementation of the Final Rule.
As you may be aware, there are a significant number of SSA Administrative Law Judges who are not currently compliant with the active state bar membership requirement. OPM has taken the position that these Administrative Law Judges are not qualified to serve as Administrative Law Judges because they fail to meet a continuing requirement of their position. As to those affected Administrative Law Judges, we would like guidance regarding:
- whether they are obligated to advise the claimants in their pending cases that they do not meet a continuing requirement for their position under the Final Rule;
- whether they must cease scheduling cases until they can come into compliance with the Final Rules' requirements;
- whether they are required to cease the adjudicatory process on cases pending before them, i.e. decision making processes; and
We raised these issues with OPM in our informal discussions, but OPM directed us to raise these concerns with the individual agencies. As you know, there is a substantial backlog of cases at the Social Security Administration. We hope that your response to this inquiry will help alleviate any possible disruptions to the adjudication process caused by the issuance of the Final Rule
- whether they have to take any action to notify claimants in cases where a decision has been rendered, whether on appeal or not, that they did not meet a continuing requirement for their position under the Final Rule when they issued their decision?
In view of the importance of the issue, I trust that you will give this matter your attention and respond to this inquiry as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Ronald G. Bernoski
President
Astrue On Today Show -- Reveals Top Baby Names
Boys: | Girls: |
---|---|
1) Jacob 2) Michael 3) Joshua 4) Ethan 5) Matthew 6) Daniel 7) Christopher 8) Andrew 9) Anthony 10) William | 1) Emily 2) Emma 3) Madison 4) Isabella 5) Ava 6) Abigail 7) Olivia 8) Hannah 9) Sophia 10) Samantha |