Disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act became part of the law in 1956, and Medicare came into being in 1965. We might assume, therefore, that the first cash disability payments made by the Social Security Administration (SSA) occurred sometime around 1956, and the first medical benefit claims would have been processed sometime around 1965.’ But in the early months of 1943, a small team from the Social Security Board (the organizational forerunner to SSA *), and the Public Health Service Administration, began adjudicating disability claims and medical benefit claims under the Civilian War Benefits (CWB) program.’ From March 1943 until the program ended in May 1945, SSA adjudicated about 1,000 disability claims and assisted in the processing of thousands of claims for medical-care reimbursement. The CWB program continues even into the present day. As of September 1996, there were four CWB beneficiaries-three receiving survivors benefits and one receiving partial disability benefits. The total benefit payout in fiscal year 1996 for this vanishing program was $14,773.4 The idea behind this unique wartime program was that there are inevitably civilian casualties of war, civilians who become injured or killed through some action related to the hostilities of war, and the intent was to pay disability, survivors, and medical-care benefits to such civilians.
Oct 25, 2007
Social Security's First Disability Program
A little history about a little known program from a 1997 Social Security Bulletin article:
Michael Astrue's Paygrade
From Wikipedia:
Level I of the Executive Schedule
Level I of the Executive Schedule is the pay grade for cabinet officials. In addition to the fifteen cabinet secretaries, seven positions are listed in the Level I, of which only four (Administrator of the EPA, Director of the OMB, Director of the National Drug Control Policy, and the U.S. Trade Representative) are in the cabinet. The remaining three are:
And the rate of pay for Level 1 of the Executive Schedule is $175,000 per year, according to the Office of Personnel Management.
Oct 24, 2007
Bristol Office Closing Amendment
From the Bristol Blog of the Bristol Press, although this amendment applies to any Social Security office, not just the Bristol, CT office:
Senators Joe Lieberman (ID-CT) and Chris Dodd (D-CT) took a significant step forward in the fight to prevent the Social Security Administration (SSA) from closing its field office in Bristol. The Senate unanimously passed an amendment introduced by both Senators to the appropriations bill that funds the Departments of Education, Labor and Health and Human Services (HHS) that would not allow SSA to close the Bristol office until they meet certain requirements (outlined below). The bill now must go to President Bush. ...
The amendment requires SSA to provide the following to Congress before closing the Bristol field office:
• A thorough analysis of the criteria used for selecting field offices for closure and how the SSA analyzes and considers factors relating to transportation and communication burdens faced by seniors and the disabled as a result of field office closures;
• A cost-benefit analysis of closing the office that takes the following into account:
- The savings anticipated by the closure;
- The burdens placed on seniors and the disabled;
- Any costs associated with replacing the services lost by closing the office.
Federal Register Alert
Social Security has sent over the following item to go in the Federal Register tomorrow:
Social security benefits and supplemental security income:
Cost-of-living increase, and other determinations, E7-21070
This may be a boring technical notice about non-discretionary matters, but it could contain something more interesting. I do not want to get people excited, but it could also contain an increase in the attorney fee cap.
Other Appropriations Amendments Affecting Social Security
Here is a list other amendments offered yesterday on the Senate floor to the Labor-HHS Appropriations bill affecting Social Security Administration and their fate:
Harkin (for Lieberman/Dodd) Amendment No. 3418 (to Amendment No. 3325), to prohibit the use of funds to close a field office of the Social Security Administration before submission of a report justifying the closure. Passed by unanimous consent
Ensign amendment No. 3342 (to amendment No. 3325), to prohibit the use of funds to administer Social Security benefit payments under a totalization agreement with Mexico. Passed 91-3Ensign amendment No. 3352 (to amendment No. 3325), to prohibit the use of funds to process claims based on illegal work for purposes of receiving Social Security benefits. Passed 92-3
Oct 23, 2007
Senate Adds $150 Million For SSA
The Senate voted today for $150 million more in funding for the Social Security Administration, on top of the $125 million more than the President's budget that had already been reported out of committee. This means a total of $275 million more than the President's budget. This may be enough to not only prevent the hiring freeze, but to enable some additional hiring -- if it becomes final. See below for more information on what happened.
Remember that after the bill is finally passed by the Senate, it will go to a conference committee to work out differences with the bill passed by the House of Representatives. The House voted only for $100 million over the President's recommended budget. Even after the bill is finally passed by the Congress, the President has promised to veto it. Republicans in the House of Representatives have vowed to sustain the President's veto. The dispute over this appropriations bill could go on for several months and the ultimate outcome for Social Security and many other agencies is quite uncertain.
Remember that after the bill is finally passed by the Senate, it will go to a conference committee to work out differences with the bill passed by the House of Representatives. The House voted only for $100 million over the President's recommended budget. Even after the bill is finally passed by the Congress, the President has promised to veto it. Republicans in the House of Representatives have vowed to sustain the President's veto. The dispute over this appropriations bill could go on for several months and the ultimate outcome for Social Security and many other agencies is quite uncertain.
Fiscal 2008 Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations - Social Security Administration
| Oct. 23, 2007 | Senate Roll Call Vote 389 |
| Bingaman, D-N.M., amendment no. 3440 to the Harkin, D-Iowa, substitute amendment no. 3325. The Bingaman amendment would increase by $150 million the amount appropriated for the Social Security Administration's administrative expenses account, offset by a reduction from the Medicare Physician Assistant and Quality Initiative Fund. The substitute would appropriate $605.5 billion in fiscal 2008, including $149.9 billion in discretionary spending, for the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS) and Education and for related agencies. It would provide $63 billion for the Education Department, $14.9 billion for the Labor Department and $479.1 billion for HHS. |
| Adopted by a vote of 88-6: | ||
| | Republicans | 42-6 |
| | Democrats | 44-0 (Northern Democrats 39-0, Southern Democrats 5-0) |
| | Independents | 2-0 |
| YEAS (88) | ||
| REPUBLICANS (42) | ||
| Alexander, L. (TN) | Dole (NC) | McConnell (KY) |
| Barrasso (WY) | Domenici (NM) | Murkowski (AK) |
| Bennett (UT) | Ensign (NV) | Roberts (KS) |
| Bond (MO) | Enzi (WY) | Sessions, J. (AL) |
| Brownback (KS) | Graham (SC) | Shelby ( |
| Bunning (KY) | Grassley (IA) | Smith, G. (OR) |
| Chambliss (GA) | Hagel (NE) | Snowe (ME) |
| Cochran (MS) | Hatch (UT) | Specter (PA) |
| Coleman (MN) | Hutchison (TX) | Stevens (AK) |
| Collins (ME) | Isakson (GA) | Sununu (NH) |
| Corker (TN) | Kyl (AZ) | Thune (SD) |
| Cornyn (TX) | Lott (MS) | Vitter (LA) |
| Craig (ID) | Lugar (IN) | Voinovich (OH) |
| Crapo (ID) | | Warner (VA) |
| DEMOCRATS (44) | ||
| Akaka (HI) | Feinstein (CA) | Murray (WA) |
| Baucus, M. (MT) | Harkin (IA) | Nelson, Ben (NE) |
| Bayh (IN) | Inouye (HI) | Nelson, Bill (FL) |
| Bingaman (NM) | Johnson, Tim (SD) | Pryor (AR) |
| Boxer (CA) | Kerry (MA) | Reed, J. (RI) |
| Brown, S. (OH) | Klobuchar (MN) | Reid, H. (NV) |
| Byrd (WV) | Kohl (WI) | Rockefeller (WV) |
| Cantwell (WA) | Landrieu (LA) | Salazar, K. (CO) |
| Cardin (MD) | Lautenberg (NJ) | Schumer (NY) |
| Carper (DE) | Leahy (VT) | Stabenow (MI) |
| Casey (PA) | Levin, C. (MI) | Tester (MT) |
| Conrad (ND) | Lincoln (AR) | Webb (VA) |
| Dorgan (ND) | McCaskill (MO) | Whitehouse (RI) |
| Durbin (IL) | Menendez (NJ) | Wyden (OR) |
| Feingold (WI) | Mikulski (MD) | |
| INDEPENDENTS (2) | ||
| Lieberman (CT) | Sanders (VT) | |
| NAYS (6) | ||
| REPUBLICANS (6) | ||
| Allard (CO) | Coburn (OK) | Gregg (NH) |
| Burr (NC) | DeMint (SC) | Inhofe (OK) |
| DEMOCRATS (0) | ||
| | ||
| INDEPENDENTS (0) | ||
| | ||
| NOT VOTING (6) | ||
| REPUBLICANS (1) | ||
| McCain (AZ) ? | | |
| DEMOCRATS (5) | ||
| Biden (DE) ? | Dodd (CT) ? | Obama (IL) ? |
| Clinton (NY) ? | Kennedy, E. (MA) ? | |
| INDEPENDENTS (0) | ||
Social Security Press Release
A press release just issued by Social Security:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, today announced that the Social Security Administration published new rules that update its medical listings for people filing for disability benefits based on digestive disorders, including diseases of the liver, stomach and colon. Social Security’s medical listings are one of the key elements used in determining whether or not someone qualifies for disability benefits. The new rules are a key step in the Commissioner’s initiative to update and improve the medical listings used to evaluate people with disabilities. For the first time, the agency will use a composite of quantitative measures to ensure that people with severe liver disease receive benefits far more quickly than in the past.
“Social Security’s disability examiners are working with digestive listings that do not accurately reflect advances in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive disorders,” Commissioner Astrue said. “As a result many cases that should be resolved quickly are not being determined appropriately. The changes to our digestive listings are among the many steps we are taking in our effort to bring about accurate allowances for people who apply for Social Security disability.”
The changes to the digestive listings reflect state of the art advances in medical knowledge, treatment, and methods of evaluating digestive disorders and Social Security’s own program experience. In addition, Social Security has developed a new disability calculator tool that will be used for the evaluation of chronic liver disease in adults and children. This tool is the first of its kind used by the agency to help evaluate whether or not someone qualifies for disability.“By improving our listings and predictors for digestive disorders, we can more appropriately identify those individuals who should qualify for disability benefits,” Commissioner Astrue noted. “Making these types of updates is one of the ways we can improve our service to the American people.”
While the agency is expanding its listings to include more digestive impairments, it is also removing some prior listings that no longer appropriately identify individuals who are disabled -- for example, the listing for peptic ulcer disease, which is rarely disabling. To learn more about the effects of various digestive disorders, please visit www.health.nih.gov/search.asp/5. To learn more about Social Security’s disability program visit www.socialsecurity.gov/disability.
The press release does not mention the following projected cost savings per fiscal year (FY) shown in the Federal Register notice on the new listings:
FY 2008 $10 million
FY 2009 $19 million
FY 2010 $27 million
FY 2011 $35 million
FY 2012 $42 million
Total for next five years $132 million
Make no mistake about it, this is a dramatic tightening of the rules and will result in far more claims being denied, particularly claimants suffering from liver disease.
FY 2008 $10 million
FY 2009 $19 million
FY 2010 $27 million
FY 2011 $35 million
FY 2012 $42 million
Total for next five years $132 million
Make no mistake about it, this is a dramatic tightening of the rules and will result in far more claims being denied, particularly claimants suffering from liver disease.
Results Of Last Week's Unscientific Poll
Do you think that withholding of fees for non-attorney representatives of Social Security claimants is a good thing for claimants?
| Yes (35) | 57% |
| |
| No (20) | 33% |
| |
| Don't Know/No opinion (6) | 10% |
|
Total Votes: 61
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)