Oct 23, 2007

Senate Adds $150 Million For SSA

The Senate voted today for $150 million more in funding for the Social Security Administration, on top of the $125 million more than the President's budget that had already been reported out of committee. This means a total of $275 million more than the President's budget. This may be enough to not only prevent the hiring freeze, but to enable some additional hiring -- if it becomes final. See below for more information on what happened.

Remember that after the bill is finally passed by the Senate, it will go to a conference committee to work out differences with the bill passed by the House of Representatives. The House voted only for $100 million over the President's recommended budget. Even after the bill is finally passed by the Congress, the President has promised to veto it. Republicans in the House of Representatives have vowed to sustain the President's veto. The dispute over this appropriations bill could go on for several months and the ultimate outcome for Social Security and many other agencies is quite uncertain.

Fiscal 2008 Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations - Social Security Administration



Oct. 23, 2007

Senate Roll Call Vote 389

HR 3043


Bingaman, D-N.M., amendment no. 3440 to the Harkin, D-Iowa, substitute amendment no. 3325. The Bingaman amendment would increase by $150 million the amount appropriated for the Social Security Administration's administrative expenses account, offset by a reduction from the Medicare Physician Assistant and Quality Initiative Fund. The substitute would appropriate $605.5 billion in fiscal 2008, including $149.9 billion in discretionary spending, for the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS) and Education and for related agencies. It would provide $63 billion for the Education Department, $14.9 billion for the Labor Department and $479.1 billion for HHS.


Adopted by a vote of 88-6:

Republicans

42-6

Democrats

44-0 (Northern Democrats 39-0, Southern Democrats 5-0)

Independents

2-0


Vote Key

YEAS (88)

REPUBLICANS (42)

Alexander, L. (TN)

Dole (NC)

McConnell (KY)

Barrasso (WY)

Domenici (NM)

Murkowski (AK)

Bennett (UT)

Ensign (NV)

Roberts (KS)

Bond (MO)

Enzi (WY)

Sessions, J. (AL)

Brownback (KS)

Graham (SC)

Shelby (AL)

Bunning (KY)

Grassley (IA)

Smith, G. (OR)

Chambliss (GA)

Hagel (NE)

Snowe (ME)

Cochran (MS)

Hatch (UT)

Specter (PA)

Coleman (MN)

Hutchison (TX)

Stevens (AK)

Collins (ME)

Isakson (GA)

Sununu (NH)

Corker (TN)

Kyl (AZ)

Thune (SD)

Cornyn (TX)

Lott (MS)

Vitter (LA)

Craig (ID)

Lugar (IN)

Voinovich (OH)

Crapo (ID)

Martinez (FL)

Warner (VA)


DEMOCRATS (44)

Akaka (HI)

Feinstein (CA)

Murray (WA)

Baucus, M. (MT)

Harkin (IA)

Nelson, Ben (NE)

Bayh (IN)

Inouye (HI)

Nelson, Bill (FL)

Bingaman (NM)

Johnson, Tim (SD)

Pryor (AR)

Boxer (CA)

Kerry (MA)

Reed, J. (RI)

Brown, S. (OH)

Klobuchar (MN)

Reid, H. (NV)

Byrd (WV)

Kohl (WI)

Rockefeller (WV)

Cantwell (WA)

Landrieu (LA)

Salazar, K. (CO)

Cardin (MD)

Lautenberg (NJ)

Schumer (NY)

Carper (DE)

Leahy (VT)

Stabenow (MI)

Casey (PA)

Levin, C. (MI)

Tester (MT)

Conrad (ND)

Lincoln (AR)

Webb (VA)

Dorgan (ND)

McCaskill (MO)

Whitehouse (RI)

Durbin (IL)

Menendez (NJ)

Wyden (OR)

Feingold (WI)

Mikulski (MD)

INDEPENDENTS (2)

Lieberman (CT)

Sanders (VT)

NAYS (6)

REPUBLICANS (6)

Allard (CO)

Coburn (OK)

Gregg (NH)

Burr (NC)

DeMint (SC)

Inhofe (OK)

DEMOCRATS (0)

INDEPENDENTS (0)

NOT VOTING (6)

REPUBLICANS (1)

McCain (AZ) ?

DEMOCRATS (5)

Biden (DE) ?

Dodd (CT) ?

Obama (IL) ?

Clinton (NY) ?

Kennedy, E. (MA) ?

INDEPENDENTS (0)

No comments: