The Detroit News has an editorial about the long delays in adjudicating Social Security disability claims. This is a followup to a news item they ran recently.
Sep 24, 2009
Appropriations Situation
From the Capitol Insider put out by the Disability Policy Collaboration:
With the start of Fiscal Year 2010 less than two weeks away, both Houses of Congress are expected to pass a Continuing Resolution (CR) to keep the federal government operating on October 1. None of the twelve FY 2010 appropriations will be enacted by then. Four of the bills are ready to be finalized by House and Senate conferees. The House has yet to appoint their conferees. The first CR is likely to expire on November 1. At least one more CR will be necessary before all of the bills, either singly or combined into an omnibus appropriations bill, will be enacted.
No COLA This Year, But Maybe This
From Congressional Quarterly:
House Democrats could move legislation as early as this week to prevent Medicare premiums from rising sharply for certain senior citizens.
Democratic leaders have not decided whether to move the bill, with an estimated cost of $2.1 billion, as a stand-alone measure or as part of a stopgap spending bill to keep the government funded through the end of October. The House may vote on that measure Thursday.
The problem lawmakers want to address arises from the likelihood that Social Security recipients will not get a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) in their benefits next year for the first time in 35 years.
At the same time, premiums for Medicare Part B, which covers physician services and outpatient care, are expected to rise. Because Part B premiums are typically deducted from monthly Social Security checks, the lack of a COLA next year will mean an effective reduction in benefits for a minority of seniors.
A "hold harmless" provision in federal law would shield about 75 percent of Medicare beneficiaries from having to pay the Part B premium increase if there is no increase in their Social Security benefits.
But the remaining 25 percent -- a group that includes seniors newly qualifying for Medicare -- would not only have to shoulder a Part B premium increase, but they also would have to pay a portion of the increased premiums the government isn't able to collect from seniors held harmless. Those who would be stuck with the bill are low-income seniors who receive benefits from both Medicare and Medicaid; seniors with incomes above $85,000 if they are single and $170,000 for couples; and people who are new to the program.
Sep 23, 2009
New Rules On Attorney Fees
From today's Federal Register:
Social Security also rescinded Ruling 85-3 concerning the subject matter of the new regulations.
We are revising our rules to allow representatives, in certain instances, to charge and receive a fee from third-party entities without requiring our authorization. We are also eliminating the requirement that we authorize fees for legal guardians or court-appointed representatives who represent claimants before us if a court has already authorized the fees. We are revising our rules to reflect changes in representatives' business practices and in the ways claimants obtain representation, and to improve the efficiency of our representative fee process.
NCSSMA Issues Newsletter - SSA Legislative Proposals
The National Council of Social Security Management Associations (NCSSMA) has issued its August 2009 issue of its newsletter, Frontline. Here is an excerpt from an interview with Angela Arnett, Social Security's Acting Deputy Commissioner for the Office of Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, which more or less makes her head of lobbying for Social Security:
Could you share some of the legislative changes that SSA has proposed recently and tell us where we are in the process? How likely is it that these changes will be passed and how long do you think it will take?We recently sent a package of proposals to OMB [Office of Management and Budget, which is part of the White House] for approval. I would reiterate that SSA does not officially have any legislative proposals until OMB approves them. Following are the most significant proposals in that package.
- Simplify computation of the workers' compensation DI offset
- Eliminate the SSI dedicated account
- Clarify the policy relating to nonpayment of fugitive felon/parole violators
- Allow State DDS reconsideration of disability cessations made by the Commissioner
- Eliminate annual payee accountings for parents and spouses
- Provide protective filing for wounded warriors
- Prohibit retroactive payments to individuals in prison
Sep 22, 2009
Ft. Wayne Jounal Gazette Editorial
The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette is running an editorial about the long delays in adjudicating Social Security disability cases. They think their government should be doing better.
Increased User Fee Opposed
From HousingWire.com:
The Social Security Administration (SSA) plans to raise its fees for verifying mortgage borrowers’ identities, a move that is facing Congressional opposition.
The fee for mortgage and financial institutions to authenticate borrower Social Security numbers is set to increase from $0.56 to $5.00 per verification on October 1. But Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) is said to be leading a Congressional challenge to the increase, according to a statement from Rapid Reporting, a Fort Worth, Texas-based national provider of third-party income, identity and employment verification services.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)