As President Obama and Congress brace to battle over how to reduce chronic annual budget deficits, Americans overwhelmingly say that in general they prefer cutting government spending to paying higher taxes, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll. ...Nearly two-thirds of Americans choose higher payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security over reduced benefits in either program. And asked to choose among cuts to Medicare, Social Security or the nation’s third-largest spending program — the military — a majority by a large margin said cut the Pentagon.
While Americans are near-unanimous in calling deficits a problem — a “very serious” problem, say 7 out of 10 — a majority believes it should not be necessary for them to pay higher taxes to bridge the shortfall between what the government spends and what it takes in.
Jan 21, 2011
Little Support For Benefit Cuts
From the New York Times:
Labels:
Financing Social Security
Jan 20, 2011
Some Budget Ideas
The Republican Study Committee has released its budget proposals. Here are a couple of highlights:
- Reduce federal discretionary spending to 2006 levels -- and hold it there for ten years
- Cut the federal workforce by 15% by only hiring one worker for every two who leaves until the 15% reduction is achieved
Can you imagine the Social Security Administration with 9,000 fewer employees? If this were applied to Social Security, it would be impossible for the agency to fulfill its statutory obligations as they stand now, much less as they increase over the next few years as the baby boomer generation ages. Makes perfect sense if you hate Social Security and think that most of the country agrees with you.
Labels:
Budget
Democratic Members Of House Social Security Subcommittee Announced
The Democrats have announced their members for the House Social Security Subcommittee. This is the full lineup for the Subcommittee:
Republicans
Kevin Brady, TX, Chairman
Pat Tiberi, OH
Aaron Schock, IL
Erik Paulsen, MN
Rick Berg, ND
Adrian Smith, NE
Democrats:
Xavier Becerra, CA, Ranking Member
Lloyd Doggett, TX
Shelley Berkley, NV
Fortney "Pete" Stark, CA
Republicans
Kevin Brady, TX, Chairman
Pat Tiberi, OH
Aaron Schock, IL
Erik Paulsen, MN
Rick Berg, ND
Adrian Smith, NE
Democrats:
Xavier Becerra, CA, Ranking Member
Lloyd Doggett, TX
Shelley Berkley, NV
Fortney "Pete" Stark, CA
Labels:
Social Security Subcommittee
Interview With The Commissioner
The Washington Post is running an interview with Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. Here are a couple of excerpts:
I'm a big believer in trying to speak in my own voice. Maybe it's a little colorful, but at the end of the day employees will know that I'm really trying to talk to them. I can be in Miami or Tucson and employees will come up to me and say one of the things that I appreciate about your broadcast is that I know that you actually wrote the material - it sounds like you. ...
I think one of things that you would get unanimity from my executives is I run what lawyers call "hot bench." I read the materials in advance, and I don't bother with things that I see being done right. Instead, I try to get to the heart of what the hard issues are and to make sure that they're on track.
Labels:
Commissioner
Jan 19, 2011
What The Insiders Want
From Dean Baker writing at the Huffington Post:
The insiders in Washington really really want to cut Social Security, and they are prepared to say or do anything to do it. Among the latest lines is that they want to make Social Security more "progressive." This sort of rhetoric appeared in a report from the liberal Center for American Progress (CAP) in a plan that proposes substantial cuts in benefits. ...
It would lead to substantial reductions in Social Security benefits for people who earned an average of $60,000 or $70,000 during their working lifetimes. ...
Jan 18, 2011
Childrens' Benefits Draw Scrutiny
From the Boston Globe:
Key members of Congress are demanding an investigation into whether a fast-growing, $10 billion federal disability program designed to serve poor disabled children is flawed in multiple ways, including the possibility that it creates incentives for families to put those children on psychiatric drugs.
A top member of the US House Ways and Means Committee, along with Representative Richard Neal and Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts, issued a letter asking the Government Accountability Office to investigate the striking rise in the number of children receiving Supplemental Security Income benefits, or SSI, for behavioral and mental issues such as attention deficit disorders and depression, and whether low-income families are tempted to put their youngsters on psychiatric drugs “to improve their chances’’ of qualifying. It also asked investigators to examine whether the Social Security Administration, which runs the program, can effectively screen new recipients and adequately determine when children’s conditions have improved to the point that they are no longer eligible for benefits.
Labels:
Childrens' Disability
9% Increase In Social Security Civil Actions
The number of civil actions brought in the federal courts to obtain review of decisions made by the Social Security Administration went up from 12,820 in 2009 to 13,958 in 2010, an increase of 9%.
Labels:
Federal Courts,
Statistics
Jan 17, 2011
The Waiting Room Videos
I had a hearing recently that was scheduled at a Social Security field office. The field office had recently moved to a new building. Hearings at field offices had been rare in the past but that may be changing.
I sat in the waiting room for about ten minutes before it was time for my client's hearing. I had a chance to see and hear the video that was playing. The video was intended to educate those waiting. The concept of the video was to mix the education with a travelogue. What I saw started out in Charleston, SC. There was an interviewer and an interviewee. I think the interviewer was a Social Security public affairs employee and the interviewee was the Charleston District Office manager, who appeared to have ankylosing spondylitis (which has a rather distinctive appearance). Mostly, they were taking a carriage ride around the elegant city of Charleston describing some sights and spouting some Social Security information. The next segment was in Bowling Green, KY. I saw little of it before I was called to my client's hearing. What I saw of both segments was a bit clunky. That did not bother me. I see no reason why Social Security should go all out for slickness. Conceptually, doing it as a travelogue seemed like a great idea to me. The subject matter is inherently boring. You have to do something to spice it up.
The videos I saw were of two cities in Social Security's Atlanta Region. Is this video just being shown in the Atlanta Region? What is being shown in other regions?
The videos I saw were of two cities in Social Security's Atlanta Region. Is this video just being shown in the Atlanta Region? What is being shown in other regions?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)