There has been one prominent exception in Social Security's rush to make it possible to file claims for benefits online -- Supplemental Security Income (SSI) claims. It looks like that exception will soon end. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, Social Security and other agencies must seek the approval of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for any new form that the agency may ask the public to complete and that includes online forms. Social Security has just sent over a request for approval of forms for the "Modernized SSI Claims System (MMMICS)" and this includes a request for "MSSICS/Signature Proxy." This sure sounds like an online form to me.
Mar 30, 2012
Mar 29, 2012
I Think We Have A Ringer!
From time to time I notice reader posts on this blog that appear to be from ringers -- people pretending to be Social Security employees who aren't. Here's one now:
Figured a claimant's finacial assistance the other day. If she were paying taxes, she would have to make about $20.00 an hour to have what she is currently receiving from all finacial assitance. I can not think of any reason she would ever try to go to work. With her background and abilities she is not worth over $8.00 an hour. An thus the system continues to redistribute the wealth.If you are talking about $20 an hour, you're talking about approximately $3,500 per month. There is no way you can get to this number if you are talking about needs based assistance. You cannot get much over $1,000 a month. If you are talking about non-needs based assistance -- Title II benefits -- you could get a bit higher but still you could not get to $3,500 per month. And for that matter, Social Security employees are not in a good position to calculate the value of Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance. How would a Social Security employee compute this anyway? I say the post quoted above is bogus. Don't believe everything you hear on Fox News. Relying on public benefits is a tough life. It's never the equivalent of $3,500 per month of income.
Field Office Managers Stressed
The National Council of Social Security Management Associations (NCSSMA), an organization of Social Security management personnel, has released its March 2012 newsletter. Hiring is mostly frozen at Social Security. Inevitably, this causes problems since attrition is uneven. Some field offices have no employees leaving but some small offices have several employees leaving. The newsletter has an article on this problem. Some badly affected offices receive help from other components of the agency but others receive no help and struggle. One particularly interesting point is that new telephone systems in field offices allow managers to see just how bad phone service has been in their offices and to allot additional resources. This has improved field office telephone service but at a cost to other workloads. Field office managers also complain that they are forced into more production work such as answering the telephone and working at the reception window. This leaves them inadequate time for management duties and forces them into overtime to try to keep up.
Mar 28, 2012
A Snapshot
Monthly Statistical Snapshot, February 2012
(released March 2012)
- Table 1. Number of people receiving Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, or both, February 2012
- Table 2. Social Security benefits, February 2012
- Table 3. Supplemental Security Income recipients, February 2012
| Type of beneficiary | Total | Social Security only | SSI only | Both Social Security and SSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All beneficiaries | 61,138 | 52,975 | 5,387 | 2,777 |
| Aged 65 or older | 39,507 | 37,444 | 899 | 1,165 |
| Disabled, under age 65 a | 13,822 | 7,722 | 4,488 | 1,612 |
| Other b | 7,809 | 7,809 | . . . | . . . |
| SOURCE: Social Security Administration, Master Beneficiary Record, 100 percent data. Social Security Administration, Supplemental Security Record, 100 percent data. | ||||
| NOTES: Data are for the end of the specified month. Only Social Security beneficiaries in current-payment status are included. | ||||
| . . . = not applicable. | ||||
| a. Includes children receiving SSI on the basis of their own disability. | ||||
| b. Social Security beneficiaries who are neither aged nor disabled (for example, early retirees, young survivors). | ||||
| CONTACT: (410) 965-0090 or statistics@ssa.gov. | ||||
| Type of beneficiary | Beneficiaries | Total monthly benefits (millions of dollars) | Average monthly benefit (dollars) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (thousands) | Percent | |||
| All beneficiaries | 55,752 | 100.0 | 62,707 | 1,124.80 |
| Old-Age Insurance | ||||
| Retired workers | 35,876 | 64.3 | 44,165 | 1,231.10 |
| Spouses | 2,291 | 4.1 | 1,393 | 608.30 |
| Children | 605 | 1.1 | 366 | 604.60 |
| Survivors Insurance | ||||
| Widow(er)s and parents a | 4,216 | 7.6 | 4,881 | 1,157.70 |
| Widowed mothers and fathers b | 148 | 0.3 | 129 | 873.60 |
| Children | 1,926 | 3.5 | 1,512 | 785.10 |
| Disability Insurance | ||||
| Disabled workers | 8,630 | 15.5 | 9,584 | 1,110.70 |
| Spouses | 163 | 0.3 | 49 | 298.60 |
| Children | 1,897 | 3.4 | 627 | 330.70 |
| SOURCE: Social Security Administration, Master Beneficiary Record, 100 percent data. | ||||
| NOTES: Data are for the end of the specified month. Only beneficiaries in current-payment status are included. | ||||
| Some Social Security beneficiaries are entitled to more than one type of benefit. In most cases, they are dually entitled to a worker benefit and a higher spouse or widow(er) benefit. If both benefits are financed from the same trust fund, the beneficiary is usually counted only once in the statistics, as a retired-worker or a disabled-worker beneficiary, and the benefit amount recorded is the larger amount associated with the auxiliary benefit. If the benefits are paid from different trust funds the beneficiary is counted twice, and the respective benefit amounts are recorded for each type of benefit. | ||||
| a. Includes nondisabled widow(er)s aged 60 or older, disabled widow(er)s aged 50 or older, and dependent parents of deceased workers aged 62 or older. | ||||
| b. A widow(er) or surviving divorced parent caring for the entitled child of a deceased worker who is under age 16 or is disabled. | ||||
| CONTACT: (410) 965-0090 or statistics@ssa.gov. | ||||
| Age | Recipients | Total payments a (millions of dollars) | Average monthly payment b (dollars) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (thousands) | Percent | |||
| All recipients | 8,164 | 100.0 | 4,493 | 515.60 |
| Under 18 | 1,294 | 15.8 | 829 | 613.60 |
| 18–64 | 4,806 | 58.9 | 2,806 | 532.50 |
| 65 or older | 2,064 | 25.3 | 858 | 414.60 |
| SOURCE: Social Security Administration, Supplemental Security Record, 100 percent data. | ||||
| NOTE: Data are for the end of the specified month. | ||||
| a. Includes retroactive payments. | ||||
| b. Excludes retroactive payments. | ||||
| CONTACT: (410) 965-0090 or statistics@ssa.gov. | ||||
Mar 27, 2012
Trying Way Too Hard
From an e-mail I received this morning:
Social Security’s Ticket to Work Program Hosting First Disability Employment Twitter Chat on March 30th
Topic: “Career Help for People with Developmental Disabilities”
When: Friday, March 30, 2012, 1:30 p.m., EST
Where and How: Follow @chooseworkssa and the hashtag #DEChat on Twitter
Mar 25, 2012
Musings On Exchanging A Propane Tank
I need to exchange the propane tank for my gas grill this afternoon. (What an exciting lead sentence!) This puts me in mind of the last time I did this. I stopped by a convenience store near my house. When I went in there was a fellow in line ahead of me whom I recognized. He is the retired chief justice of North Carolina. He had a distinguished legal career before becoming Chief Justice. He had an outstanding tenure as Chief Justice. He has an unblemished reputation for rectitude. What was he doing in the convenience store? He was buying lottery tickets.
My point is that we should be reasonable in our expectations about any group of people who bear the title "judge", including Social Security's Administrative Law Judges. People with the title of "judge" almost always try to live up to their title but they are made of the same stuff as the rest of us.
Mar 24, 2012
Mar 23, 2012
Is The Actuarial Reduction Still Fair?
Full retirement age for Social Security benefits is currently 66. This will soon start rising to 67. Most people go on Social Security retirement benefits before their full retirement age, a key fact that is usually lost when politicians talk of raising the retirement age. Those who go on retirement benefits before their full retirement age receive reduced benefits. This is called the actuarial reduction. This actuarial reduction was 20% when the full retirement age was 65 and is going up to 25% when the full retirement age reaches 67. Alicia Munnell and Steven Sass at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College ask whether the actuarial reduction, which was first enacted more than 50 years ago, remains appropriate. Their conclusion is that it remains pretty close to actuarial equivalence. Their study is flawed, however, by the fact that they pretended that full retirement age was still 65. I don't understand why they did that. They certainly know what the current full retirement age is and doing the projections for full retirement age being 67 should not have been that difficult.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)