Oct 17, 2007
Social Security Budget Comes Up In Senate Tomorrow
The Labor-HHS budget bill comes up for action on the Senate floor tomorrow. This is the budget bill that includes the Social Security Administration.
Labels:
Budget
Another Post On The Baby Boomer Event
From the Entitled To Know blog of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare:
We have to admit to being more than just a little confused when we read press coverage of yesterday’s baby boomer event at the National Press Club. Just in case you missed it, the nation’s first baby boomer, Kathleen Casey-Kirschling, filed online for Social Security benefits yesterday to much hoopla.
But what was truly unexpected about this event was the lack of the administration’s usual gloom and doom propaganda. In fact, Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue was incredibly reasonable and definitely not singing from the same “sky-is-falling-the-baby-boomers-will-suck-us-dry” hymnal preferred by the Bush administration.
Here is what Commission Astrue said about Social Security’s financial outlook:“There’s no reason for any immediate panic”
“It’s not catastrophic”
“There’s no factual basis for these ‘nuclear winter’ scenarios
many have described”
Wow. You have to wonder if the White House knows he’s sticking so closely to the facts.
But here’s where we find ourselves down the rabbit hole. While the Bush administration’s Social Security head is telling the straight story on the program’s long-term fiscal picture (unlike what we generally hear elsewhere from this administration), multiple news organizations virtually ignored it in favor of the White House’s crisis propaganda. Almost all of the coverage today parrots the administration’s “we can’t afford the Baby Boomers ” line even though that is not what the SSA Commissioner actually said at this event.
The Washington Post even went so far as to belittle the Commissioner and Casey-Kirschling for having the nerve to express their confidence in Social Security’s future. The media loves a crisis...this isn’t new. However, Social Security is too important to millions of American seniors and their families to play so fast and loose with the facts in the name of headlines.
Labels:
Commissioner,
Privatization
The First Boomer
Kathleen Casey-Kirschling made an appearance with Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue a couple of days ago. She was dubbed the first baby boomer to apply for Social Security benefits. Here is a background story on Ms. Casey-Kirschling in an old USA Today article. I hate to sound cynical (it's an occupational hazard) but something tells me that Ms. Casey-Kirschling has an agent or publicist. I have a hard time believing that the Social Security Administration would have sought her out.
Labels:
News of the Weird
2.3% COLA
The Associated Press is reporting that the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for Social Security benefits will be 2.3% for this year.
Labels:
COLA
Oct 16, 2007
ODAR Quality Assurance Program Coming?
Here is another small nugget from Commissioner Astrue's September 13 letter. He says that one initiative he has to work down "aged" cases, that is claims that have been awaiting a hearing for a long time, is to implement a "quality assurance program." He gives no explanation of what he means.
I do not know what this would mean other than some process by which decisions of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are reviewed for "quality" with some action being taken about those that do not exhibit sufficient "quality." The problem is that no one knows what "quality" is when we are talking about ALJ decisions. There is no gold standard. This might permit a Social Security Commissioner to rachet up or down the percentage of claims that are approved by ALJs whenever desired. This is essentially the situation with the "quality assurance" program at the initial and reconsideration levels of review. This is the sort of thing that Social Security Commissioners have desired for a long time. They have long felt that the ALJs are far too independent and need to be brought under some sort of control.
I do not know what this would mean other than some process by which decisions of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are reviewed for "quality" with some action being taken about those that do not exhibit sufficient "quality." The problem is that no one knows what "quality" is when we are talking about ALJ decisions. There is no gold standard. This might permit a Social Security Commissioner to rachet up or down the percentage of claims that are approved by ALJs whenever desired. This is essentially the situation with the "quality assurance" program at the initial and reconsideration levels of review. This is the sort of thing that Social Security Commissioners have desired for a long time. They have long felt that the ALJs are far too independent and need to be brought under some sort of control.
Labels:
Social Security Hearings
Evidence Submission Restrictions Coming
Here is an excerpt from the September 13 Astrue letter that deserves special attention:
We plan to include many of the hearing level procedures implemented under DSI and now in place for disability cases in the Boston Region into parts 404 and 416 of our rules to reduce the hearing backlog, including time frames for submitting evidence to the ALJ and closing the evidentiary record at the time of the ALJ decision. These changes will expand those rules nation-wide and apply them to hearings on both disability and non-disability matters.I have seen no evidence that these rule changes will reduce hearing backlogs.
Labels:
Social Security Hearings
September 13 Astrue Letter
On September 13 Commissioner Astrue sent a lengthy letter to the Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee that deals with Social Security. I have reproduced the letter in the separate Social Security Perspectives blog. Due to technical limitations in Blogger, the letter is spread over three posts. Click on each individual page to view it full size.
I have not had a chance to study the letter in detail yet, but it is certainly a much more complete budget picture for Social Security than any other document that has been released. It suggests tough times for the current fiscal year, but improvement in the next fiscal year, which will begin on October 1, 2008.
I have not had a chance to study the letter in detail yet, but it is certainly a much more complete budget picture for Social Security than any other document that has been released. It suggests tough times for the current fiscal year, but improvement in the next fiscal year, which will begin on October 1, 2008.
Labels:
Budget
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)