Oct 6, 2010
Not Everyone Loves Accenture
Oct 5, 2010
$2.8 Billion Contract For Accenture
From a press release:
The U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) has selected Accenture (NYSE: ACN) as a prime contractor under the Information Technology Support Services Contract (ITSSC) that will be used to acquire a wide range of IT systems development and modernization services. The ITSSC includes a one-year base period plus six additional one-year options with an aggregate ceiling valued at $2.8 billion.
Under the contract, Accenture will implement emerging technology applications designed to improve SSA’s service delivery capabilities to current beneficiaries and future retirees. Task orders issued under the contract may request services such as evaluating ways to integrate data from health records more seamlessly, expanding Web and social media to enhance user accessibility, and applying predictive models and analytics capabilities to SSA’s business.
A Happy Ending
What would have happened without the media attention?
Rhodes Scholar Gets New Social Security Number And Uses It To Commit Fraud
Former Alaskan beauty queen and Rhodes scholar, Rachel Yould, was sentenced to nearly five years in prison and ordered to pay more than $700,000 in restitution [in September] after pleading guilty in a peculiar case of fraud and double identities.Federal prosecutors indicted the Oxford University Ph.D. candidate last December on felony charges of mail, wire fraud and making false statements to influence a bank. The 38-year-old Yould, born Rachel Hall, had claimed her father sexually abused and stalked her and allegedly took on a new identity under a Social Security Administration program that aims to help rape and domestic violence victims hide from their abusers.
There is a longer Jeffrey Toobin piece in the New Yorker on this peculiar story but you have to subscribe to read it.
She's definitely not my relative.
Oct 4, 2010
A Long, Slow March
Electronic medical records may not be coming as fast as these two brothers had hoped or as fast as Social Security would like.
OIG Report On Disability Recipients Who Return To Work
The report also notes that the agency is working on a proposal to simplify its work policies to "reduce administrative complexity and workloads through program simplification" and to "encourage more DI [Disability Insurance] beneficiaries to return to work." I hope this is true and that the proposal is being developed on a different time frame than the nine year Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND).SSA convened a “Work CDR [Continuing Disability Review] Workgroup” in January 2010 to identify and implement improvements and adopted the following recommendations:
• Dedicated staff to target the oldest cases—initially, cases over 365 days old, then a gradual reduction of the age threshold;
• Prioritized earnings alerts by amount of earnings and worked cases with highest earnings to minimize overpayments;
• Improved communication between operational components; and
• Allocated additional staff resources to conduct work CDRs [Continuing Disability Reviews].
Oct 3, 2010
Multiple Social Security Numbers
More than 20 million Americans have multiple Social Security numbers associated with their names, according to a new study of commercial databases by a leading consumer risk-management firm.The study by ID Analytics Inc. in San Diego also found that about 100,000 Americans have five or more Social Security numbers tagged to their identity. Most of the associations are innocuous — a mistakenly entered digit or a transposition of two numerals — with little or no intent to defraud the legitimate owner, experts say.
Oct 2, 2010
The Lodestar Is Dead -- Long Live The Lodestar
We are presented with the question of whether district courts may employ the lodestar method to determine whether an attorney fee constitutes a “windfall” under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002). Because we read Gisbrecht as merely forbidding exclusive reliance on the lodestar method to determine the reasonableness of a 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) attorney fee, we do not conclude that Gisbrecht precludes a court’s consideration of the lodestar method altogether. And since the district court here did not rely exclusively on the lodestar method to evaluate the reasonableness of a contingency fee, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the contingency fee unreasonable under § 406(b).