April 21, 2021
The Honorable John B. Larson
Chair, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515Dear Subcommittee Chair Larson:
I am writing because I want to be clear about the negative impact to Social Security services due to the ongoing pandemic and our funding level in fiscal year (FY) 2021. Our FY 2021 annual appropriation was nearly $900 million less than my original request. It is effectively level with the funding we have received for each of the last four years, despite significant increases in costs that we do not control – such as the Government-wide pay increases.
The pandemic has resulted in unprecedented changes. The safety of the public and our employees has been the paramount driver of how we deliver services during the pandemic. To protect the public and our employees, we have necessarily limited in-person service to critical situations that can only be resolved in-person. While we continue to serve the public over the phone and online, we are still experiencing issues receiving and verifying documents and medical evidence we need to make decisions. Even with fewer applications in FY 2021, pandemic-related challenges and operational constraints present numerous barriers to employees completing workloads timely. In FY 2020, the average time it took us to complete an action in our field offices increased by 20 percent, significantly reducing our productivity. We are working diligently to address these challenges, but the abrupt changes to the way we do our work has caused bottlenecks in certain workloads and service deterioration beyond our control. On February 23, 2021, we shared with your staff the potential implications of our FY 2021 funding level to further harm services.
However, our operational challenges have been aggravated by our inability to fully use our program integrity funding. To use this funding, we must complete cost-saving continuing disability reviews (CDR) and Supplemental Security Income redeterminations. We have had to reduce our planned full medical CDRs by 30 percent due to the pandemic, the lowest level since FY 2013. We deferred these workloads in the early part of the pandemic to protect beneficiaries’ income and healthcare and to reduce the burden on the medical community, which had stopped most elective services.
While we restarted these workloads at the end of FY 2020, we are handling them through the mail and over the phone. During the pandemic, these complex workloads often require multiple contacts with a beneficiary, which slows our ability to complete this work. In addition, over 30 percent of our initial disability claims and CDRs require a consultative exam (CE) with a medical provider so that we can obtain enough medical information to make a decision. Right now, just over 70 percent of our CE providers are scheduling in-person exams. We have focused our limited CE capacity on initial disability claims to ensure that we can provide benefits to people who qualify. Even with that focus, the average processing times for initial disability claims increased about 45 days in the last year. Ultimately, we currently estimate the constraints on our program integrity funding deepens our shortfall by approximately $200 million.
Since becoming Commissioner, I have focused our actions and our resources on efforts to improve the service we provide to the millions of people who turn to us for help. I have been clear in my budget requests about what it takes to improve service and maintain the integrity of our programs: both additional frontline staff to help people now, and information technology (IT) investments to improve our future. IT is fundamental to offering the public more electronic and online options they expect from organizations today, improving the technology to make it easier for our staff to help the public, and ensuring we have a safe, modern platform to support over $1 trillion in benefits payments each year.
I have frozen hiring in non-frontline positions so that we can push all available resources to the offices that directly serve the public. I have increased the staffing in our field offices, national 800 number, processing centers, and State disability determination services (DDS) by nearly 3,000 people since 2019. I have increased IT investments to accelerate our modernization and increase online service options.
We are working with the advocate community to help ensure that the most vulnerable populations can access our services. Our efforts include a robust communications campaign, in combination with a wide range of online resources, to provide information on service options for the beneficiary and individuals or organizations that help them.
I also decided to pay employee awards so they know that we appreciate their hard work and dedication, especially during this difficult time. I have pushed the agency to find creative ways to maintain these efforts despite the significant cut to our budget request this year.
We have explored all possibilities to eliminate our budget shortfall but we are unable to overcome it. I have no other option but to delay our planned hiring to operate within our appropriated resources. Further, we will not be able to compensate for fewer employees with additional overtime. We are operating with the lowest level of overtime in the last decade. These decisions have a lasting negative impact on the service we can provide to the American public. It will increase waits for service from our field offices and on our 800 number as we begin to emerge from the pandemic. The number of pending actions in our processing centers will grow from about 3.7 million actions pending at the end of FY 2020 to more than 4.2 million actions pending by the end of FY 2021. It will delay our plan to eliminate the backlog of cases in the DDS, which currently has about 20 percent more pending cases than prior to the pandemic, as we anticipate an increase in disability receipts into FY 2022.
The pandemic has changed the way we do work at SSA in unprecedented ways. At the start of the pandemic, we transitioned to remote work, focused on critical service workloads through online and telephone options, and suspended some adverse actions to protect the public during an especially critical time. The pandemic required necessary operating adjustments to safely serve the public, reducing our ability to complete our workloads and contributing to increased backlogs and wait times in some priority service areas. These novel factors prevented us from achieving some of our goals in FY 2020 and put our goals for FY 2021 and future years at risk. FY 2021 is a critical year to shape the agency for post-pandemic success, but our resource constraints will delay our recovery.
I appreciate President Biden’s support of our needs with his FY 2022 budget request of nearly $14.2 billion for us, which is $1.3 billion more than what we received this year to operate our agency. No one anticipated the duration of the pandemic and the ongoing challenges it presents. I hope you will consider these challenges and support his request to help us improve service.
Sincerely,
Andrew Saul
Commissioner
Apr 26, 2021
Sounds Like A Plea For A Supplemental Appropriation This Year -- But Why Didn't We Hear This When Trump Was President?
A letter that the Social Security Administration posted online (emphasis added):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I give Saul credit for being honest and writing this letter regarding funding.
.
The Biden Administration should immediately provide more funding for overtime. I've worked at SSA for 40 years and I've seen time and again that overtime is necessary to keep up with the workload and the backlogs.
On the few times that SSA tried to cut severely cut overtime during my career, it backfired . After 6 months or so the backlogs got so bad that they were forced to reinstate overtime, and encouraged employees to work it. But by then the hole was so deep it took many months to dig out of it.
I recall post entitlement cases sitting in the payment center, aging for more than a year, due to the heavy backlogs created by the overtime cuts. I fear SSA will soon be in a similar situation.
The employee awards are a joke. They are paltry. The best way to better use the current budgetary funds is to get rid of all the excessive management jobs that exist at hearing offices and field offices. Paying so many folks who do so little work a GS13 or G14 salary is an utter disgrace.
The awards will help employee morale and without overtime they will help employees financially. The awards cost much less than offering continuous overtime.
There are too many high grade employees in Systems at SSA. Computer programmers use to be GS-12 but due to grade creep now they are all GS-13 or GS-14. Paid well over 100K per year and a waste of taxpayer money.
AFGE did a FOIA request years ago to compare managment bonuses vs field bonuses. It was eyebrow raising.
I see the McConnells and Grahams of the GOP just loving this. The GOP has hated social security since birth and has, since Reagan, been killing it slowly. And letters like these are solid gold. Too many people ignore the role the GOP played in setting SSA up to fail but will point to it's failures and shortcomings, as Saul has outlined, as proof that to save it, it must be killed.
"Since becoming Commissioner, I have focused our actions and our resources on efforts to improve the service we provide"
That's just blatantly false. All he has done as Commissioner is make life unpleasant for SSA employees by limiting work from home and union activities.
@11:57am - If we don't pay competitive salaries to IT staff, we will not be able to retain or recruit them. The alternative is to use more contractors which costs 1.5 to 2 more than a Federal FTE. IT knowledge and experience is valuable in today's marketplace ... SSA needs to be able competitively compete in the marketplace both in private and public ... a GS-13/14 particularly in the National Capital Region is not big dollars.
OHO has been a jobs program for lawyers for going on 15 months now. Through the first part of that time there was overtime for decision writing when there was not enough work to cover straight time. Management is still busy making up work. More funding for OHO?! How about an early out to save some money and better match workload to staffing?
The early out would be better used on the useless management folks at hearing offices who do nothing but crunch numbers and spy on employees all day.
Post a Comment