Jun 9, 2021

Budget Projections

       Some excerpts from Social Security's budget projections (bolded) with my comments:

     "The Budget would increase staffing for frontline operations including State DDSs by over 6 percent." -- You say that as if frontline staffing is your real priority but if the agency gets what's proposed, its funding goes up by almost 10% but staffing only increases by 6%.

      "Over $2.7 billion for current staff, additional hiring, and other expenses for the State DDSs to make our disability determinations. This amount includes funding for 1,300 additional employees we are hiring in FY2021, an increase of about 10 percent." -- OK, so DDS staffing goes up 10%, which corresponds with the 10% increase in the budget. However, "frontline staffing" which includes DDS only goes up 6%. If I'm doing the math correctly, this means that "frontline staffing" apart from DDS goes up by a lot less than 6%. 

     "More than $2.1 billion for IT services funding to help us maintain and continue modernizing our large IT infrastructure, as well as increase our digital and automated services." -- The FY 2021 IT number was $1.9 billion so the projection is for an 11% increase which is a bit above the approximately 10% overall budgetary increase. However, contrast this with the 6% increase in frontline staffing and you get an idea of management priorities.

     Overtime:

  • FY 2020 (actual) 1801 FTEs 
  • FY 2021 (projected) 1,155 FTEs 
  • FY 2022 (projected) 1,800 FTEs

 -- They expect to get a nearly 10% increase in funding but overtime will be slightly less in FY 2022 than in FY 2020. How do they expect to work off the backlogs at their field offices and payment centers? As we'll see below, the answer, at least for the payment centers, is that they don't expect to work off the backlogs.

      Disability claims receipts:

  • FY 2020 (actual) 2,213
  • FY 2021 (projected) 2,491
  • FY 2022 (projected) 3,111

-- I don't understand the FY 2021 number. There have been far fewer disability claims filed in the current fiscal year than the last so why are they saying it's up? Anyway, they're projecting a 25% increase in disability claims in the next fiscal year. That's as good a guess as any but nobody knows. It could easily be a good deal more or less than that.

     National 800 number: Average speed of answer projected to go down from 15 minutes to 12 minutes. -- That still sucks

     Office of Hearings Operations Production per Workyear: 

  • FY 2020 (actual) 93
  • FY 2021 (projected) 80
  • FY 2022 (projected) 103

-- I don't know what these numbers mean but if the are meaningful, they're saying that productivity at the hearing offices has taken a major hit during the pandemic but will soar in the next fiscal year. If these numbers mean anything, OHO employees should knock off the talk about how they've been just as productive working from home. Also, it would be nice if we had productivity numbers for other agency components.

     "We plan to hire ALJs by the end of FY 2022 to ensure we have adequate resources in our hearings operations." -- I think you may need them sooner but I'm glad you're planning for this. I hope you haven't forgotten that you need additional staff to go with those ALJs. Also, remember it takes time to hire and train people.

     "In FY 2022, we plan to reduce the PC backlog from 4.2 million actions to 4.14 million actions." -- That's almost no improvement in the backlog. Sounds like the payment centers aren't your priority.

     In FY 2022 the agency expects to " Begin nationwide rollout of the modern HACPS that increases the accuracy and efficiency of disability case processing for our hearings offices and Appeals Council." -- What is HACP? How does it increase accuracy and efficiency?

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ahh yes, hire more ALJs...more reps getting out of the business.

Anonymous said...

Guide to HACPS Case Processing
HACPS can be thought of as a program or system consisting of multiple applications, similar to Microsoft Office. Currently, HACPS consists of two web-based applications: Case Analysis and Case Processing.
Case Analysis is being developed to encompass and improve the functionality of programs such as DGS, FIT, and eBB. Case Processing is being developed for OHO’s use to encompass and improve the functionality of CPMS.
As the functionality of these applications grows, they will operate together, providing a one-stop shop for processing all cases, conducting case analyses, and drafting decisions.

Anonymous said...

"If these numbers mean anything, OHO employees should knock off the talk about how they've been just as productive working from home."

OHO employees are very productive at home. Case pending times at OHO are at record lows and my judges have virtually no cases lingering in ALPO, no long delays between UNWR and MAIL.

There are fewer cases to process, but that's not on OHO staff, they are doing historic things with the work they have.

Anonymous said...

While I understand replacing ALJs based on retirements, etc., I am not really understanding the need for additional hires when there are ALJs sitting around with nothing to do because there are not enough cases to fill their dockets. I would like to understand the basis for the 25% projection in disability claims being filed in FY 2022. I am just not seeing any increase now, which certainly could be a function of closed offices and inability to get SSA employees to answer calls in some offices.

Certainly agencies need to use the budget they are given or they will get less next time; its all a game that has to be played. But hiring ALJs you will then be stuck with, when there aren't enough cases to keep them all busy seems a little odd.

Anonymous said...

HACPS is probably useful for bean counters, but for line staff it's just a bloated POS that's being forced down our throats.

Anonymous said...

10:43 - Expanded unemployment benefits will soon end. A portion of that population will find new employment, a portion won't and will apply for disability benefits. Same things happened after the 2007-2008 financial crisis. (I realize people on this blog have all sorts of theories as to why there was a huge increase in disability claims right after people lost their jobs, but the correlation if not the causation is evident.)

SSA only belatedly hired more judges after the financial crisis, which led to large case backlogs and congressional oversight. I guess they want to mitigate that possibility this go-round.

Anonymous said...

10:52 - Unfortunately SSA is run by bean counters. "Accuracy and efficiency" of disability case processing is a result of adequate resources, training, and the time allotted to ensure the work is given the requisite amount of attention. From what I can tell thus far, HACPS just multiplies the number of mouse clicks it takes to get anything done. I'm sure from a reporting standpoint, that does wonders, but from a workflow standpoint, it is certainly less efficient and does nothing for accuracy. Unless they mean the accuracy of your ability to lick on buttons, in which case success!

Anonymous said...

No talk of ending the 2-plus year hiring freeze for non-Operational components, either. The people running the show are absolutely clueless.

Anonymous said...

HACPS is a system that automates the decision making and writing process. Most of the cases issued over the past year or so used this system. Great for bean counters and control freaks. Tries to knock out any out of the box analysis. Its natural progression will be turning ALJs into automatons. Not good for claimant. May be worth a FOIA fight before its too late.

Anonymous said...

@10:20... thank you for pointing out what is obvious to anyone willing to perform more than minimal analysis on that information.

@4:52... “ [HACPS] tries to knock out any out of the box analysis. Its natural progression will be turning ALJs into automatons.”

This is only true if you have zero creativity or zero technical ability to use a basic computer. HACPS can be used with minimal inputs to generate instructions with plenty of room to address nuance or provide an explanation for the decision. I’m very curious to know what “out of the box” analysis it eliminates. I’m guessing either lazy/sloppy handwritten instructions or perhaps the kind of out of the box thinking that got the merry band of four hauled before Congress in 2014.

Anonymous said...

Just a reminder, there is a lot more to SSA than just disability and the needs of an ever declining pool of representatives are not the priority and never ever should be.