Common Sense

     Rebecca Vallas on The Zero Hour talks some common sense about Social Security disability.

An Overpayment Case

Sue Farrar

     Republican members of Congress equate Social Security overpayments with fraud. When I see Social Security overpayments they're mostly like the case of Sue Farrar, a woman whose $31,000 overpayment was entirely due to a mistake the agency made. Ms. Farrar was then faced with dealing with an agency which is increasingly becoming incommunicado, an agency which seems determined to leave her with no income. She only gets something like relief after the intervention of the news media. There is nothing unusual about Ms. Farrar's case. It happens every day all across the country with one exception. Normally, there is no media intervention.

From 1937

Congressman Thinks Definition Of Disability Is Too Subjective

     From West Virginia Metro News:

... Republican Congressman Jim Lankford (OK-5) said it will take years to fully implement the kinds of reforms [Social Security ] needs — especially when it comes to disability benefits. ...  Lankford — who met with the new Social Security leadership this week — serves as chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements for the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. In June, that committee released a report entitled “Systemic Waste and Abuse at the Social Security Administration.” ... 

Overall, Lankford said the definition of “disabled” has become subjective. “It should be a very clear cut thing. The definition of when you get Social Security disability is when you’re unable, due to medical reasons, unable to do any job in the economy. That’s a very clear definition — any job in the economy.” ...

The State Of Service At Social Security

     An e-mail I just got from an attorney at another firm:

Does anyone happen to have the fax # to the ______ District Office? 

Someone from our office has tried calling but they are closed & the 1-800 # reportedly has a 1hr & 10 min wait time. 

Thanks for any help on this one.

Off Topic: What's Up With Horse Head Masks?

     I'm in the mall the other day and there's some kid walking around wearing a horse head mask. Now I see a picture of the President shaking hands with some jackass wearing a horse head mask. I'm feeling old and out of the loop. This doesn't seem funny to me; just creepy. Can anyone explain what's going on? Épater la bourgeoisie?

UI Offset Under Consideration In Highway Bill

     From a letter sent by the Coalition for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) to the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee.  CCD is a major umbrella group of organizations serving disabled people:

The undersigned members of the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) write to express our opposition to proposals to eliminate or reduce concurrent Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits as a partial offset for funding the Highway Trust Fund under the Preserving American’s Transit and Highways Act (PATH Act).

The SSDI and UI programs were established for different purposes and largely serve different populations. Receiving UI and SSDI concurrently is legal and appropriate. This has been the long - standing position of the Social Security Administration and of the court.

"The Capital's Chief Scapegoat Wrangler"

     From Michael Hiltzik at the Los Angeles Times:

As we all know, the official animal of Washington, D.C., is the scapegoat. Today's example is Carolyn W. Colvin, the acting commissioner of Social Security.

Colvin recently was raked over the coals by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista [CA], the capital's chief scapegoat wrangler, for problems at Social Security that can largely be traced to its budget squeeze. In other words, to Congress.

In a letter to Colvin, who has been acting commissioner since February 2013 and has been nominated to take over the job officially, Issa blamed her for a backlog of disability reviews that dates back to before 2007 and that is directly related to Congress' failure to provide for enough administrative law judges to handle the workload.