Saul Pens Op Ed For WSJ

      There is an op ed by ousted Social Security Commissioner Andrew Saul in today's Wall Street Journal. Saul claims to have administered Social Security in a nonpartisan way. He believes he's a victim of employee unions who want to reopen contract negotiations.

     Saul is certainly correct that the labor unions are most responsible for his firing. However, they were only out to get him because of his highly partisan effort to destroy the unions. I don't know why he expected them to turn the other cheek or for a Democratic administration to ignore their complaints.

     The absurd thing about this op ed is that Saul's claim to have administered Social Security in a nonpartisan fashion is being published in what must be the most highly partisan Republican editorial page in the country. That's hardly a good way to prove your non-partisanship. Perhaps he offered it to other newspapers first but they weren't interested.

     The most important thing about this op ed may be the fact that it sounds as if Saul accepts that he's been fired. There's no talk about litigation. The litigation would have gone nowhere but it would still have been an annoyance.

COLA Will Be High This Year

      Already, we're getting projections of what the Cost Of Living Adjustment (COLA) will be for Social Security this year. It's clear it will be far higher than what we're used to. The Kiplinger Letter is predicting it will be 6.3%. I don't know that they should be but Social Security recipients always seem happy to see large COLAs even though their purchasing power hasn't really increased.

Larson Approves

      The Chairman of the House Social Security Subcommittee has expressed satisfaction with the provisions of the appropriations bill covering Social Security recently passed by the House of Representatives. I’m sure the going will be slower in the Senate, however.

How Much Does Social Security Offset The Motherhood Penalty?

      From How Much Does Social Security Offset The Motherhood Penalty? by Matthew S. Rutledge, Alice Zulkarnain, and Sara Ellen King:

Click on image to view full size

House Appropriations Bill Advances

      I posted yesterday about the draft report on the appropriations bill covering Social Security under consideration in the House Appropriations Committee. I emphasized that it was only a draft. Well, that draft advanced yesterday. It's now been reported out by the House Appropriations Committee. Of course, it still must be considered on the floor of the House and in the Senate but it's moving forward quite rapidly compared to what has happened in recent years. The current fiscal year ends on September 30, 2021.

Lots Of Interesting Language In Draft House Appropriations Committee Report

      The draft House Appropriations Committee report on the Labor-HHS Appropriations Bill, which includes administrative funding for the Social Security Administration, is out. This hasn't been voted on even in committee, much less on the floor of the House of Representatives or the Senate. The report contains language showing appropriation amounts, which, if adopted, would be mandatory but it also contains a good deal of what we may call recommendations. Agencies aren't under a legal obligation to act on those recommendations but they always have to pay attention to them and often act on them. There is more of this sort of language than I can ever recall seeing for Social Security. Here are some excerpts from this draft (emphasis added): 

... LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 

Appropriation, fiscal year 2022      $11,219,945,000 

Budget request, fiscal year 2022    12,341,896,000 

Committee Recommendation        12,219,945,000 

Change from enacted level         +1,000,000,000 

Change from budget request       -121,951,000 ...

The Committee provides an increase of not less than $650,000,000 to support frontline operations in field offices, teleservice centers, and program service centers. In addition, the recommendation includes the increase requested in the budget to replace losses and build capacity at the State Dis-ability Determination Services (DDS) agencies that make disability determinations for SSA.Within the recommended funding level, the Committee provides $89,500,000 for SSA to mail paper statements to all contributors aged 25 and older not yet receiving benefits ...

 The Committee considers the Final Rule ‘‘Hearings Held by Administrative Appeals Judges of the Appeals Council’’ (85 Fed. Reg. 73138, December 16, 2020) to be an unjustified erosion of due process for individuals who are appealing a denial of Social Security or SSI benefits. ...In light of the harm that would be caused by this policy change, the Committee strongly urges SSA not to exercise this authority ...

The Committee continues to be deeply concerned about the impact of Presidential Executive Order 13843 (July 10, 2018) on the judicial independence of adminstrative law judges (ALJs). The Order eliminates the competitive hiring process for ALJs and has the potential impact of converting independent adjudicators to political appointees, undermining long-standing principles of fair and unbiased consideration of matters of vital importance to the American people. ALJs must be independent decision-makers and it is the Committee’s expectation that SSA maintain the highest standards for appointment of ALJs. ...

The Committee recognizes that the pandemic disrupted progress SSA made with its initial disability claims backlog, and remains concerned about the adverse impacts disability claim hearings backlogs have on an individual’s ability to access their Social Security benefits. Accordingly, the Committee urges the Commissioner to prioritize the hiring of additional administrative law judges and requisite staff to adjudicate backlogged claims. In addition, the Committee directs the Commissioner to continue to prioritize efforts to reduce wait time disparities across the country by directing resources and workload assistance, as necessary, and to provide the Committee annual reports on efforts to reduce the hearing backlog for Hearing Offices in the bottom twenty of national ranking by average processing time. ...

The Committee is concerned about the time it takes SSA to effectuate favorable SSI and/or SSDI disability determinations and directs SSA to submit a report to the Committee within 180 days of enactment of this Act, on SSA’s procedures for paying past-due and ongoing benefits after a claimant has been found disabled.  ... 

The Committee believes that quality representation in matters with SSA assists claimants and beneficiaries, and can also help SSA work more accurately and efficiently. The Committee continues to support direct payment of fees to representatives, encourages the Commissioner to raise and index the cap on fees payable via fee agreement, and requests that the Commissioner add a Performance Measure on timely and accurate payment of representative fees to the Fiscal Year 2022 and subsequent Annual Performance Plans. ...

The Committee reiterates its support for well-managed telework programs in the Federal workplace, which have demonstrated benefits for human capital as well as continuity of operations. The Committee expects SSA to implement telework policies that support these goals while also strengthening service to the American public, including in-person service in community-based field offices. The Committee directs SSA to submit a report within 90 days of enactment of this Act detailing the agency’s telework policies and identifying any positions for which telework has not been provided or has been reduced from pre-October 2019 levels,along with the reasons for any telework reductions. ...

The Committee understands that during the COVID–19 pandemic, SSA is providing claimants with the option of a video hearing, a telephone hearing, or a postponement if the individual would prefer to wait until an in-person hearing is available. The Committee expects that once the COVID–19 pandemic ends, SSA will resume in-person hearings.

Post Covid Disability

      Scientific American has a piece on the threat of chronic disability from Covid-19. It warns of the possibility of a million Americans with long Covid overwhelming agencies such as the Social Security Administration.

     This may well happen but I can't say that I'm seeing it or hearing about it from others representing Social Security claimants. I'll be happy if a big wave of post Covid disability never arrives. A few months ago I wrote about taking on one client disabled by Covid but I haven't taken on any more such cases since then and that client already had major health problems before Covid-19 came along. He could have easily been pushed over the edge into disability by any serious infection, such as non-Covid pneumonia. Maybe the post-Covid cases will show up later. It's hard for most people to admit even to themselves that they're disabled. People procrastinate even as all reasonable hope for recovery fades away.

Hoist With Their Own Petard And Getting No Sympathy From Me

      From the Washington Post:

Ousted Social Security commissioner Andrew Saul, the Trump appointee who declared Friday he would defy his firing by President Biden, on Monday found his access to agency computers cut off, even as his acting replacement moved to undo his policies.

“I’m here to do the job,” Saul said from his home in Katonah, N.Y., where he had led the agency since the coronavirus pandemic forced most operations to shift in March 2020 to remote work, “but I can’t do anything with the communications shut down.”

 Saul, 74, called his firing and that of his deputy David Black, in an email from the White House Personnel Office, a “palace coup” ...

“There will be more,” said Saul, a wealthy former women’s apparel executive and prominent Republican donor who had served on the board of a conservative think tank that has called for cuts to Social Security benefits. “Stay tuned.” ...

His acting successor, Biden appointee Kilolo Kijakazi, took the reins Monday and was briefed by her staff on the agency’s top priorities, advocates in touch with her office said, including much anticipated planning for the safe reopening of Social Security’s national network of 1,200 field offices. ...

Senate GOP aides, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss political strategy, said they plan floor speeches starting this week ... to express their dismay with the White House. ...

Republicans also said they are considering procedural actions to block any permanent Biden nominees to the agency on the Senate floor.

“It’s not like Saul was a blazing partisan,” said one Senate GOP aide. “Our view is that longer terms for agencies like this exist for a reason.” ...

     There's so much here! Saul calls his ouster a "palace coup." What? Did he think he was a king? A threat of litigation? I'm sure the President is quaking in fear. Read the recent opinions of the Supreme Court and see if you think whatever lawsuit Saul files is going to get anywhere. Dark threats of procedural actions to block a nomination? I'm pretty sure that's not possible under current Senate rules. Saul not a "blazing partisan"? Are you kidding me? I can't even imagine what they think a "blazing partisan" would look like at Social Security if Saul wasn't one. Now they think that longer terms exist for a reason. Republicans are the ones who came up with the unitary executive theory that blew up longer terms. Do they think they're the only ones who get to use the unitary executive theory? Hoist with their own petard and getting no sympathy from me.