Dec 4, 2008

Can't Spend The Money Fast Enough

Take a look at this post by Nobel-prize winning economist Paul Krugman to his blog at the New York Times. Krugman believes that our economy is losing jobs at an incredible rate. The new conventional wisdom is that we need massive infrastructure spending to prevent an economic calamity, but Krugman fears that it will take most of a year before infrastructure projects can kick in. We may be at double digit unemployment before infrastructure projects can even help the economy in any significant way.

As I read this, I wonder how Social Security would fit into a situation in which it becomes urgent for the federal government to spend money rapidly. A temporary moratorium on the FICA tax? Large bonus payments to Social Security recipients? Interim benefits for Social Security disability claimants? Massively increased operational budget for the agency? Obviously, every agency in government would be affected, but Social Security distributes more money than any other agency.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

How about hiring 25000 to 30000 employees, with the pay and benefits that would provide, with the goal to process hundreds of thousands of backlogged claims, with the ultimate payout that would provide.
House payments, car payments, rent, utilities, food, etc. What could be a more direct and obvious stimulus than that, with an actual productive goal in mind?

Anonymous said...

I listen to Jim Rogers, someone that has actually made money in markets and he says businesses need to fail and unfortunately people will lose jobs. Then things can correct themselves.

You can't build an economy on make work WPA II jobs WPA.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/27097823

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3XmsSNt8wo&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KxWAfr4KWI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDJ3mukRPjo&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnwEsa1wUEE&feature=related

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hn-cV9sTM4&NR=1