Inconsistent Handling Of Veterans' Disability Claims

     From a recent report by Social Security's Office of Inspector General (OIG):

SSA [Social Security Administration] policy provides for disability claims filed by current and former military service members to be expedited. SSA identifies these claims as Military Casualty/Wounded Warrior (MC/WW) and Veteran 100 Percent Permanent and Total (VAPT) disability claims. ... VAPT classifications do not guarantee an allowance for SSA disability benefits. VAPT recipients must meet SSA’s disability medical eligibility and entitlement requirements. ... 

SSA does not define “expeditious” for processing MC/WW and VAPT claims, have processing time goals, or perform regular analysis of the MC/WW and VAPT claims to identify trends. Therefore, to assess the MC/WW and VAPT processing times, we compared them to the average processing time for all disability claims at the various stages of review nationally and by State. We found the following.

• At the initial claims level, SSA processed MC/WW and VAPT claims only 1 day faster than it processed all disability claims.

• SSA processed MC/WW and VAPT claims from 37 to 315 days more quickly than all disability claims at the reconsideration, hearing office, and Appeals Council levels.

• Average processing times varied across States.

There were processing delays attributable to SSA as well as delays outside SSA’s control.

Finally, SSA designed and implemented internal controls to identify and flag MC/WW and VAPT claims to prioritize the processing of those claims. However, SSA could not provide us evidence that it followed its policies and procedures to ensure staff and management properly tracked or monitored MC/WW and VAPT claims.

     By the way, I've seen the same sort of thing with other categories where Social Security is supposed to speed review, such as homeless claimants. A "critical case" designation seems to mean nothing at the initial and reconsideration levels but usually a lot at the hearing or Appeals Council levels.

Social Security Disability And The Homeless Population

     From Investigating Inequities In Accessing Social Security Disability Insurance And Supplemental Security Income For Adults Experiencing Homelessness, an M.S. thesis presented by Anna Booras at Boston University:

... The primary objective of this research study was to investigate applicant and application characteristics associated with disability outcomes among patients at the Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP) Barbara McInnis House (BMH) Medical Respite Unit and to explore the effect of advocacy in increasing access to benefits for those who qualify. ... 

It was shown that advocacy and assistance with the application process for SSI and SSDI produced an allowance rate for people experiencing or at risk of homelessness considered in this study that was almost twice the allowance rate for the homeless population in the state of Massachusetts and was significantly higher than the state general population. Despite the increase in allowance rate, the application determination times were significantly longer for the population of interest in this study as compared to the general population. ... Medical advocacy letters were found to aid in access to benefits for those with mental health primary diagnoses. ... 

In general, consultative examinations were associated with extremely lower odds of approval with only a 16.67% allowance rate overall. ...

     Programs such as Ms. Booras was investigating are great but there's not enough of them to make a dent nationally in the disabled homeless population. Private representation is critical for this population. For a long time, I've been telling colleagues who practice Social Security law that homeless clients may present some challenges but that you can win their cases and make money by helping them. This study is proof of what I have seen in my practice. My name and telephone number gets passed around at the South Wilmington Street Homeless Shelter in Raleigh, the biggest one locally. I'm happy to have the business. If you practice Social Security law, don't shy away from homeless clients.

NADE Newsletter

     The National Association of Disability Examiners (NADE), a voluntary organization of the personnel who make disability determinations for Social Security at the initial and reconsideration levels, has issued its Summer 2019 newsletter. Here's one item from "NADE's Top Issues for 2019":

Reduction in 15 Year Work History: Due to vast changes in the occupational landscape, it is unfair current regulations allow claims to be denied on the basis claimants have an ability to perform a job they performed previously but which no longer exists, or a job they would no longer recognize.

If This Is The Best You've Got ...

     The idea of increasing the federal estate tax and devoting its revenues to the Social Security trust funds must be gaining support since the National Review has an editorial out opposing the idea. They oppose it because that alone won't solve Social Security's long term financing issues. The thing is that in the same piece, the National Review supports increasing full retirement age and reducing the cost of living adjustment. Those proposals, either singly or in combination, don't solve the long term financing issues either.

     They also try arguing that increasing the estate tax punishes successful Americans but that's ridiculous. An estate tax reduces inheritances for the survivors of wealthy Americans, not the wealthy Americans themselves. The wealthy Americans may have been successful or maybe they just inherited wealth themselves but their survivors aren't inheriting money because of their own success.

Hearing Backlog Dwindling

     This is a caseload analysis report from Social Security's Office of Hearings Operations (OHO) which was obtained by the National Organization of Social Security Claimants Representatives (NOSSCR) and published in their newsletter (which is not available online to non-members).

Click on image to view full size

     Note that in May the average receipts per Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) per day was 1.39 but the average number of dispositions per ALJ per day was 2.31. It won't take long at that rate for the backlog to disappear. In retrospect, was it a good idea to increase the minimum notice of a hearing from 20 days to 75 days?

Woman Convicted Of Assaulting Social Security Worker

     From WXYZ:

A 41-year-old Ann Arbor woman was found guilty of an assault on a Social Security Administration worker after she was notified that her disability benefits had changed.

According to a press release, on Aug. 14, 2018, Latasha Long went into a Social Security Administration office in Ann Arbor to discuss issues with her ability to continue receiving disability benefits.

While interviewing with a worker, Long was told that she had reported income on her tax returns that was too high for her to continue receiving benefits. When the employee asked Long to provide additional evidence of her work and income levels for reevaluation, Long began to explain her circumstances, but the employee said that information was not different from what was already recorded.

Long then became angry, according to a release, and began to verbally insult the employee, calling her a "psycho."

When the employee proceeded to stand and close the interview window, Long then hit her in the face with a large binder, grabbed her shirt, then pulled the woman closer to further punch and scratch her. ...

Presidential Candidates On Social Security

     Yahoo Finance has gone to the trouble of putting together the views of the Presidential candidates on Social Security.

Social Security Won't Ask Supreme Court To Review Hicks v. Commissioner

     The word came out this afternoon that Social Security will not ask the Supreme Court to review Hicks v. Commissioner, the 6th Circuit opinion holding that Social Security's treatment of Eric Conn's former clients to have been unconstitutional.

      I have no idea where things will go from here with these cases. Unless the agency wants to give up, I predict continuing litigation.

ALJs Accuse Social Security Of Bargaining In Bad Faith

     From Government Executive (emphasis added):

The president of a union representing the administrative law judges who adjudicate disability claims has accused the Social Security Administration of bargaining in bad faith. The accusation follows news that federal mediators declared the agency and union to be at impasse in negotiations over a new collective bargaining agreement.

Association of Administrative Law Judges President Melissa McIntosh said her union has filed an internal grievance with the agency over its negotiating practices as they discuss a new contract. She said she believes management is focused on standardizing contracts with disparate bargaining units, rather than on improving efficiency for taxpayers. ...

The agency’s “last best offer” to the union, which was reviewed by Government Executive, includes several proposals that have become standard in the Trump administration, including shifting telework policies to be entirely at the discretion of the agency and a drastic reduction in the amount of official time the union can use. In this case, SSA proposed a 90% cut to official time, from an annual bank of 22,000 hours in the current contract to only 2,000 hours. ...

Equally troubling to the administrative law judges are proposals throughout the contract to remove references to the Administrative Procedures Act and an article affirming the “judicial function” of ALJs at the agency. The judicial function article lays out several key duties of administrative law judges, including the power to call for expert witnesses and ensure due process rights of claimants. ...

     I'm not sure that removing the reference to the Administrative Procedure Act matters but it's interesting that they want to remove it.
     By the way, it's Administrative Procedure Act, in the singular. Pluralizing the word "procedure" when talking of the APA is a sign that you're not really familiar with the Act.

Where Are The Headcount Numbers?

     I'm used to posting data on a quarterly basis from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on the number of employees at Social Security. I think the headcount is an important number that helps explain the level of service the agency provides. I haven't posted this number in about a year because OPM hasn't released any new numbers in about a year. I know that the Trump administration is threatening major change at OPM, which I don't understand, but why would they shut down this function? Is Social Security's headcount available through any other public source?