![]() |
From Wired:
The so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is starting to put together a team to migrate the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) computer systems entirely off one of its oldest programming languages in a matter of months, potentially putting the integrity of the system—and the benefits on which tens of millions of Americans rely—at risk.
The project is being organized by Elon Musk lieutenant Steve Davis, multiple sources who were not given permission to talk to the media tell WIRED, and aims to migrate all SSA systems off COBOL, one of the first common business-oriented programming languages, and onto a more modern replacement like Java within a scheduled tight timeframe of a few months. ...
SSA’s core “logic” is also written largely in COBOL. This is the code that issues social security numbers, manages payments, and even calculates the total amount beneficiaries should receive for different services, a former senior SSA technologist who worked in the office of the chief information officer says. Even minor changes could result in cascading failures across programs.
“If you weren't worried about a whole bunch of people not getting benefits or getting the wrong benefits, or getting the wrong entitlements, or having to wait ages, then sure go ahead,” says Dan Hon, principal of Very Little Gravitas, a technology strategy consultancy that helps government modernize services, about completing such a migration in a short timeframe.
You may recall that Frank Bisignano testified at his confirmation hearing that COBOL was still widely used in business and that its presence at Social Security was nothing to be too concerned about.
From Forbes:
Elon Musk lauded his Department of Government Efficiency in a Thursday interview with Fox News, saying the work of the agency, which has drawn criticism over its sweeping and rapid layoffs to the federal workforce, will allow Social Security recipients to “receive more money.” …
reports in the media that the Social Security Administration (SSA) is permanently closing local field offices are false. Since January 1, 2025, the agency has not permanently closed or announced the permanent closure of any local field office. From time to time, SSA must temporarily close a local field office for reasons such as weather, damage, or facilities issues, and it reopens when the issues are resolved. The agency has announced the permanent closure of one hearing office, in White Plains, NY.
SSA works closely with local congressional delegations before closing any office permanently. The agency also reassigns employees from an affected office to other locations to help communities access in-person services.
“SSA is committed to providing service where people need help and our local field offices are no exception,” said Lee Dudek, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. “We have not permanently closed any local field offices this year.”
SSA identified for the General Services Administration underutilized office space to ensure the government is spending taxpayer money as prudently as possible. The agency provided GSA a list of sites for termination. Most of these are small hearing rooms with no assigned employees. Since most hearings are held virtually, SSA no longer needs these underutilized rooms.
Also, the Court was not impressed with the argument that DOGE needs access to non-anonymized data in order to find patterns of fraud when they have no evidence that a pattern of fraud exists. Find it first and then those involved can be identified.
The Social Security Administration is asking Court approval to let DOGE team members back in to the agency's databases. If these DOGE employees employees actually do what they say they're going to do all but one of them, at best, will be engaged in a ridiculous waste of time. I thought they were trying to root out wasteful behavior, not engage in it. See below and, as always, click on the image to view full size:
During the pandemic Social Security made the criteria for approval of a disability claim based upon some orthopedic conditions less onerous. Regulations adopted just before Joe Biden took office had required certain medical evidence within “a close proximity of time.” The Biden Administration interpreted the phrase in a less demanding way because of the difficulties that people had obtaining medical care during the pandemic. I think there was also a realization that the Trump Administration Listings were just too difficult to meet with or without a pandemic. This temporary change was later extended until May of this year but late in the Biden Administration it was extended until 2029.
Social Security has now issued an Emergency Message saying that while the extension to 2029 remains in effect “the agency will be revisiting its policy before then.”
The moral of this story is that if a new Administration doesn’t like a regulation adopted during a prior Administration, it should change the regulation. Don’t just play games with how you interpret it. The Trump Administration would have far more trouble dealing with an actual change in a Listing than with a mere interpretation. The Listings should have been changed in other ways as well. It remains just too tough to meet. It’s the same problem as the changes in the treatment of overpayments introduced by Commmissioner O’Malley. It took no effort for a shambling joke of an Acting Commissioner to reverse O’Malley’s changes even though what O’Malley had done was popular with Republicans as well as Democrats.
I have finally watched the Bisignano confirmation hearing. I found it tedious. For the most part, it wasn't a job interview. It was a performance by all parties. I understand that there are private meetings between nominees and Senators. I hope those are more substantive.
Anyway, here are a few thoughts: