Also, the Court was not impressed with the argument that DOGE needs access to non-anonymized data in order to find patterns of fraud when they have no evidence that a pattern of fraud exists. Find it first and then those involved can be identified.
Also, the Court was not impressed with the argument that DOGE needs access to non-anonymized data in order to find patterns of fraud when they have no evidence that a pattern of fraud exists. Find it first and then those involved can be identified.
3 comments:
Leland, your fifteen minutes are up!
What is becoming apparent is that DOGE wants SSA data to investigate fraud in other programs. Its the closest they have to a Federal citizenship file. Their basic assumptions is that everyone who came before them is an idiot. Gigantic a-holes.
Hollander has been a judge for like 40 years now. No way that Lee, who made quite a Faustian bargain to run in employer into the ground, has the smarts or presence of mind to fool her.
Post a Comment