Social Security Had It All Planned For The Occupational Information Panel

Social Security's Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel has been meeting since February working on the issue of what Social Security should do about the obsolete Dictionary of Occupational Titles, a key component in determining disability at Social Security.

The minutes of the first meeting of the Panel held in February have been released. They demonstrate that Social Security already had a good idea of what it wanted. Indeed, you have to wonder whether the Panel was set up merely to validate what Social Security already planned to do.

Here are some excerpts (emphasis added):

Richard Balkus, Associate Commissioner, Office of Program Development and Research, Social Security Administration

Associate Commissioner Balkus described updating occupational data as a long-recognized need for our Social Security Disability Insurance program and our Supplemental Security Income Program and the goal of developing the parameters for the content model for the Occupational Information System. He reiterated the expectation that by the end of September, the Panel would provide direction in terms of how we approach the development of a classification system for a new occupational information system designed specifically for use in SSA’s disability programs. ...

Associate Commissioner Richard Balkus informed the Panel that SSA will undertake a research project of a national sample using electronic folders to examine cases decided at the initial and hearings levels. SSA will capture the DOT title and identify how that job was identified by the applicant. SSA will also evaluate the RFC [Residual Functional Capacity] and MRFC [Mental RFC] process used in the decision. ...

Sylvia Karman, Panel Member and Project Director, Occupational Information Development Project, Office of Program Development, Social Security Administration

Sylvia Karman discussed short term and long term plans for replacing the DOT. The short term efforts consist of two projects--one for a contract that involves a private sector DOT formatted occupational software and a second contract for an independent evaluation of the software product to determine if it can be used in SSA’s disability program. The long-term project involves developing an integrated Occupational Information System. "System," really means a classification. This will include an ongoing process to update occupational information and keep SSA’s policy current. SSA will use an integrated approach which means it will not rely on just one approach in data collection or one approach in terms of measurement. SSA will use outreach with the Occupation Information System Development (OISD) workgroup; private sector professional associations that are stakeholders; and the OIDAP FACA panel. Plans for the long-term include development of a content model and the initial classification of job demands. SSA will also test the data collection instruments used in the new system. SSA will also conduct a study to evaluate occupations that SSA claimants are currently performing. SSA will then formulate policy to incorporate the new system into SSA’s processes. ...

After much discussion, the Panel identified six broad categories for the content model that could apply to the work and person side: Physical; Cognitive; Behavioral; Environmental/Contextual/Work Site; Perceptual/Sensory; and, Skills.

Social Security is only giving the Panel seven months? Social Security had already planned two major projects for replacing the DOT before the Panel ever started meeting? What impact can this Panel have on what Social Security does? This is not how I thought Advisory Committees worked, but maybe I was just naive.